Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Wearable Microsensors to Quantify Sport-Specific Movements

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Microtechnology has allowed sport scientists to understand the locomotor demands of various sports. While wearable global positioning technology has been used to quantify the locomotor demands of sporting activities, microsensors (i.e. accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers) embedded within the units also have the capability to detect sport-specific movements.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which microsensors (also referred to as inertial measurement units and microelectromechanical sensors) have been utilised in quantifying sport-specific movements.

Methods

A systematic review of the use of microsensors and associated terms to evaluate sport-specific movements was conducted; permutations of the terms used included alternate names of the various technologies used, their applications and different applied environments. Studies for this review were published between 2008 and 2014 and were identified through a systematic search of six electronic databases: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Articles were required to have used athlete-mounted sensors to detect sport-specific movements (e.g. rugby union tackle) rather than sensors mounted to equipment and monitoring generic movement patterns.

Results

A total of 2395 studies were initially retrieved from the six databases and 737 results were removed as they were duplicates, review articles or conference abstracts. After screening titles and abstracts of the remaining papers, the full text of 47 papers was reviewed, resulting in the inclusion of 28 articles that met the set criteria around the application of microsensors for detecting sport-specific movements. Eight articles addressed the use of microsensors within individual sports, team sports provided seven results, water sports provided eight articles, and five articles addressed the use of microsensors in snow sports. All articles provided evidence of the ability of microsensors to detect sport-specific movements. Results demonstrated varying purposes for the use of microsensors, encompassing the detection of movement and movement frequency, the identification of movement errors and the assessment of forces during collisions.

Conclusion

This systematic review has highlighted the use of microsensors to detect sport-specific movements across a wide range of individual and team sports. The ability of microsensors to capture sport-specific movements emphasises the capability of this technology to provide further detail on athlete demands and performance. However, there was mixed evidence on the ability of microsensors to quantify some movements (e.g. tackling within rugby union, rugby league and Australian rules football). Given these contrasting results, further research is required to validate the ability of wearable microsensors containing accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers to detect tackles in collision sports, as well as other contact events such as the ruck, maul and scrum in rugby union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cunniffe B, Proctor W, Baker J, et al. An evaluation of the physiological demands of elite rugby union using global positioning system tracking software. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(4):1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gabbett T, Jenkins D, Abernethy B. Physical demands of professional rugby league training and competition using microtechnology. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(1):80–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wisbey B, Montgomery P, Pyne D, et al. Quantifying movement demands of AFL football using GPS tracking. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(5):531–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd L, Ball K, Aughey R. The reliability of MinimaxX accelerometers for measuring physical activity in Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;6:311–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cummins C, Orr R, O’Connor H, et al. Global positioning systems (GPS) and microtechnology sensors in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):1025–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbett T, Whyte D, Hartwig T, et al. The relationship between workloads, physical performance, injury and illness in adolescent male football players. Sports Med. 2014;44(7):989–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabbett T. Quantifying the physical demands of collision sports: does microsensor technology measure what it claims to measure? J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2319–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery P, Pyne D, Minahan C. The physical and physiological demands of basketball training and competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5:75–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cormack S, Smith R, Mooney M, et al. Accelerometer load as a measure of activity profile in different standards of netball match play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:283–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandler P, Pinder S, Curran J, et al. Physical demands of training and competition in collegiate netball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(10):2732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Mellifont R, Burkett B. The use of a single inertial sensor to identify stride, step, and stance durations of running gait. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(2):270–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plasqui G, Westerterp K. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labelled water. Obesity. 2007;15(10):2371–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jean-Louis G, Von Gizycki H, Zizi F, et al. Determination of sleep and wakefulness with the actigraph data analysis software (ADAS). Sleep. 1996;19(9):739–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weaving D, Marshall P, Earle K, et al. A combination of internal and external training load measures explains the greatest proportion of variance in certain training modes in professional rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonomi A, Goris A, Yin B, et al. Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(9):1770–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choukou M, Laffaye G, Taiar R. Reliability and validity of an accelerometric system for assessing vertical jumping performance. Biol Sport. 2014;31(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adelsberger R, Troster G. Experts lift differently: classification of weight-lifting athletes. In: IEEE conference on body sensor networks (BSN). Cambridge, MA; 2013. p. 1–6.

  18. Ahmadi A, Rowlands D, James D. Towards a wearable device for skill assessment and skill acquisition of a tennis player during the first serve. Sports Tech. 2009;2(3–4):129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Connaghan D, Kelly P, O’Connor N, et al. Multi-sensor classification of tennis strokes. In: IEEE conference on body sensor networks (BSN). Limerick; 2011. p. 1437–1440.

  20. Ganter N, Krüger A, Gohla M, et al. Applicability of a full body inertial measurement system for kinematic analysis of the discus throw. ISBS Conf Proc Arch. 2010;1(1).

  21. Ghasemzadeh H, Loseu V, Jafari R. Wearable coach for sport training: a quantitative model to evaluate wrist-rotation in golf. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2009;1(2):173–84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helten T, Brock H, Müller M, et al. Classification of trampoline jumps using inertial sensors. Sports Eng. 2011;14(2–4):155–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai D, Hetchl M, Wei X, et al. On the difference in swing arm kinematics between low handicap golfers and non-golfers using wireless inertial sensors. Proc Eng. 2011;13:219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, Mellifont R, Burkett B, et al. Detection of illegal race walking: a tool to assist coaching and judging. Sensors. 2013;13(12):16065–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghasemzadeh H, Jafari R. Coordination analysis of human movements with body sensor networks: a signal processing model to evaluate baseball swings. IEEE Sens J. 2011;11(3):603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gabbett T, Jenkins D, Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(6):578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gastin P, Breed R, McLean O, et al. Quantification of tackling demands in elite Australian football using integrated wearable athlete technology. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(6):281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gastin P, Mclean O, Breed R, et al. Tackle and impact detection in elite Australian football using wearable microsensor technology. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(10):947–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koda H, Sagawa K, Kuroshima K, et al. 3D measurement of forearm and upper arm during throwing motion using body mounted sensor. J Adv Mech Des Syst. 2010;4(1):167–78.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kelly D, Coughlan G, Green B, et al. Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device. Sports Eng. 2012;15(2):81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McNamara D, Gabbett T, Chapman P, et al. The validity of microsensors to automatically detect bowling events and counts in cricket fast bowlers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beanland E, Main L, Aisbett B, et al. Validation of GPS and accelerometer technology in swimming. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(2):234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dadashi F, Crettenand F, Millet G, et al. Front-crawl instantaneous velocity estimation using a wearable inertial measurement unit. Sensors. 2012;12(10):12927–39.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dadashi F, Crettenand F, Millet G, et al. Automatic front-crawl temporal phase detection using adaptive filtering of inertial signals. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(11):1251–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fulton S, Pyne D, Burkett B. Validity and reliability of kick count and rate in freestyle using inertial sensor technology. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(10):1051–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fulton S, Pyne D, Burkett B. Quantifying freestyle kick-count and kick-rate patterns in Paralympic swimming. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(13):1455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. James D, Leadbetter R, Neeli M, et al. An integrated swimming monitoring system for the biomechanical analysis of swimming strokes. Sports Tech. 2011;4(3–4):141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jensen U, Prade F, Eskofier B. Classification of kinematic swimming data with emphasis on resource consumption. In: IEEE conference on body sensor networks (BSN). Cambridge, MA; 2013. p. 1–5.

  39. Stamm A, James D, Burkett B, et al. Determining maximum push-off velocity in swimming using accelerometers. Proc Eng. 2013;60:201–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chardonnens J, Favre J, Gremion G, et al. A new method for unconstrained measurement of knee joint angle and timing in alpine skiing: comparison of crossover and crossunder turns. ISBS Conf Proc Arch. 2010;28:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chardonnens J, Favre J, Le Callennec B, et al. Automatic measurement of key ski jumping phases and temporal events with a wearable system. J Sport Sci. 2012;30(1):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chardonnens J, Favre J, Cuendet F, et al. Characterization of lower-limbs inter-segment coordination during the take-off extension in ski jumping. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(4):741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harding J, Mackintosh C, Hahn A, et al. Classification of aerial acrobatics in elite half-pipe snowboarding using body mounted inertial sensors. Eng Sport. 2008;7:447–56.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marsland F, Lyons K, Anson J, et al. Identification of cross-country skiing movement patterns using micro-sensors. Sensors. 2012;12(4):5047–66.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No funding was received for the conduct of this study and preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Welsh Rugby Union, Westgate Street, Cardiff, Wales

    Ryan Chambers

  2. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia

    Ryan Chambers, Tim J. Gabbett & Michael H. Cole

  3. School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Tim J. Gabbett

  4. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Adam Beard

Authors
  1. Ryan Chambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim J. Gabbett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael H. Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adam Beard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim J. Gabbett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chambers, R., Gabbett, T.J., Cole, M.H. et al. The Use of Wearable Microsensors to Quantify Sport-Specific Movements. Sports Med 45, 1065–1081 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0332-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0332-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation