An in vivo comparison of anterior tibial translation and strain in the anteromedial band of the anterior cruciate ligament

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90612-IGet rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this in vivo study was to determine if strain in the anteromedial band (AMB) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) may be predicted by an external measurement of anterior tibial-femoral translation. A Hall effect strain transducer was implanted on the AMB of five human subjects with normal intact ACLs. AMB strain was then measured during anterior shear loading of the tibia relative to the femur, with the knee flexed to 30 and 90°, simulating the loads applied in the Lachman and anterior drawer tests, respectively. The Knee Signature System, a commercially available arthrometer, was used to simultaneously measure anterior tibial translation relative to the femur. The resulting AMB strains and translations during anterior shear loading of the tibia with respect to the femur at 30 and 90° were compared using a regression analysis to determine if AMB strain could be predicted from a measure of anterior tibiofemoral translation at either flexion angle. AMB strain at 150 N anterior shear load at 30° flexion (3.0%) was significantly greater than that at 150 N anterior shear load at 90° flexion (0.9%). During anterior shear loading at 30° flexion, AMB strain correlated with anterior tibial translation (r2 = 0.59). However, there was no significant correlation between AMB strain and anterior tibial translation for anterior shear loading at 90° flexion (r2 = 0.002). Therefore, AMB strain was not accurately predicted from an external measurement of tibial displacement at 90° in this experiment.

References (25)

  • S.W. Arms et al.

    Strain measurement in the medial collateral ligament of the human knee: an autopsy study

    J. Biomechanics

    (1983)
  • J.G. Howe et al.

    Arthroscopic strain gage measurement of the normal anterior cruciate ligament

    J. Arthroscopy

    (1990)
  • S.W. Arms et al.

    The biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and reconstruction

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (1984)
  • W.L. Bargar et al.

    In vivo stability testing of post meniscectomy knees

    Clin. Orthop.

    (1980)
  • D. Barry et al.

    Design and performance of a modified buckle transducer for the measurement of ligament tension

    J. biomech. Engng

    (1986)
  • B.D. Beynnon et al.

    Anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo

    Int. Orthop.

    (1992)
  • D.L. Butler et al.

    Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study

    J. Bone Jt Surg.

    (1980)
  • D.L. Butler et al.

    Surface strain variation in human patellar tendon and knee cruciate ligaments

    J. biomech. Engng

    (1990)
  • P. Edixhoven et al.

    Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee drawer tests

    J. orthop. Res.

    (1987)
  • R.A. Fischer et al.

    The functional relationship of the posterior oblique ligament to the medial collateral ligament of the human knee

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (1985)
  • B.C. Fleming et al.

    Clinical versus instrumented knee testing

    Clin. Orthop.

    (1992)
  • T. Fukubayashi et al.

    An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior knee motion of the knee

    J. Bone Jt Surg.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (50)

    • On the derivation of a tensor to calculate six degree-of-freedom, musculotendon joint stiffness: Implications for stability and impedance analyses

      2013, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Without any loading, the knee, shoulder, and spine translate an average of 8.7 mm (Walker et al., 1988), 1.9 mm (Graichen et al., 2000), and 1.4 mm (Boden and Wiesel, 1990), respectively, during passive motion. With larger shearing forces, these joints can translate much further, potentially causing passive tissue damage or joint dislocation (Fleming et al., 1993; Lippitt et al., 2003; Howarth, 2011). Despite strong empirical evidence suggesting that muscles can provide joint stiffness and prevent translational motion (Hirokawa et al., 1991), there have been limited attempts to quantify muscular translational stiffness (Oosterom et al., 2003; Cashaback et al., 2013).

    • Arthrometric curve-shape variables to assess anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

      2012, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In previous studies, the point of initial engagement of the ACL during anterior drawer was defined as the “just-taut” point (Fleming et al., 1993). Fleming et al. indicated in five live subjects that a mean anterior load of 17.1 (SD 11.6) N is necessary for the ACL to reach its just-taut length (Fleming et al., 1993). Our results indicate that there is a great deal of variability between individuals in the amount of force required to engage the ACL.

    • Biomechanical risk factors of non-contact ACL injuries: A stochastic biomechanical modeling study

      2012, Journal of Sport and Health Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      These previous studies combined with the results of the current study suggest that the greater knee valgus moment due to the ground reaction force is a risk factor of non-contact ACL injury, as well. Previous studies, however, also demonstrated that knee valgus moment alone may not be able to cause isolated ACL injury with minimum MCL damage as clinical observations showed.44,46–48 The three risk factors confirmed by the results of this study are consistent with the literature.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text