Elsevier

Clinical Biomechanics

Volume 11, Issue 4, June 1996, Pages 194-200
Clinical Biomechanics

Paper
Time-dependent changes in the lumbar spine's resistancc to bending

https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(96)00002-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. To show how time-related factors might affect the risk of back injury.

Design. Mechanical testing of cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Background. High bending stresses acting on the lumbar spine are associated with injuries to the intervertebral discs and ligaments. Since these soft tissues are viscoelastic, the bending stress (‘bending moment’) must depend on the speed of movement and the duration of loading, but this has not previously been quantified.

Methods. Forty-five cadaveric lumbar segments, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were loaded in combined bending and compression in order to simulate movements and postures in living people. The relationship between flexion angle and bending moment was determined at different loading rates, and after sustained loading in bending and in compression.

Results. Rapid flexion movements increased the peak bending moment by 10–15% compared to slow movements. On average, repeated flexion over a period of 5 min reduced the peak bending moment by 17%, and 5 min of sustained flexion reduced it by 42%. Two hours of compressive creep loading reduced the height of the intervertebral discs by 1.1 mm, increased the range of flexion by 12%, and reduced peak bending moment by 41%.

Conclusions. The scale of these changes suggests that, in life, the risk of bending injury to the lumbar discs and ligaments will depend not only on the loads applied to the spine, but also on loading rate and loading history.

References (39)

  • MA Adams et al.

    The resistance to flexion of the lumbar intervertebral joint

    Spine

    (1980)
  • MA Adams et al.

    Prolapsed intervertebral disc. A hyperflexion injury

    Spine

    (1982)
  • MA Adams et al.

    Gradual disc prolapse

    Spine

    (1985)
  • SJ Gordon et al.

    Mechanism of disc rupture — a preliminary report

    Spine

    (1991)
  • A Shirazi-Adl

    Strain in fibres of a lumbar disc. Analysis of the role of lifting in producing disc prolapse

    Clin Biomech

    (1989)
  • P Brinckmann et al.

    Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae

    Clin Biomech

    (1988)
  • P Brinckmann

    Injury of the annulus fibrosus and disc protrusions. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs

    Spine

    (1986)
  • MA Adams et al.

    The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine

    Spine

    (1981)
  • NA Duncan et al.

    The role of axial rotation in the etiology of unilateral disc prolapse: an experimental and finite-element analysis

    Spine

    (1991)
  • Cited by (141)

    • Biomechanical assessment of a passive back-support exoskeleton during repetitive lifting and carrying: Muscle activity, kinematics, and physical capacity

      2022, Journal of Safety Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      By limiting the trunk flexion, the compression on the lumbar intervertebral discs and the amount of stretching in the posterior ligaments of the spine could be decreased (Ulrey & Fathallah, 2013). Furthermore, the laxity of the passive tissues could also increase with the cumulative mechanical low back load throughout the work, thereby increasing the range of motion of the trunk (Adams & Dolan, 1996; Adams, Dolan, & Hutton, 1987; Coenen et al., 2014). From this point of view, the PBSEs could prevent people from working at the limit flexion angle by limiting the motion of trunk during the lifting (Bonato et al., 2003; Ulrey & Fathallah, 2013).

    • About the impact of repetitive spine flexions due to labour on passive mechanics of the lumbar spine

      2021, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Half an hour of palletising changes the stiffness of the passive lumbar torque-angle relation. In contrast to the creep of passive tissue evident with long-term loading (Adams and Dolan, 1996; Solomonow et al., 1999; Kurutz, 2006; Ker, 2007; Pearson et al., 2007) repetitive lumbar flexions provoked by palletising did not result in creep of the lumbar spine's passive mechanics in general, that is, we could not confirm our hypothesis of a right shift of the lumbar passive torque-angle relation. Accordingly, repetitive active flexion of the lumbar spine seems to affect the lumbar spine in a more complex manner than pure passive loading.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text