Research report
On knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery

https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00030-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The distinction between ‘knowing how’ and ‘knowing that’ is fundamental to current theories of cognition. Two distinct encodings or representations are implied, one conscious and verbalisable and the other normally unconscious yet demonstrable in behaviour. The paper discusses the nature of these two kinds of representation and relations between them. It is shown that imagery forms an essential mediating link between the two encodings and a theoretical model — the Action-Language-Imagination or ALI model — is presented. An important feature of the model is the role attributed to the motor system in generating imagery and principal features of motor imagery are reviewed in the context of the ALI model and with reference to recent experimental findings. Problems in mapping conscious representations of action onto physical brain mechanisms are briefly discussed. It is proposed that the physical basis of imaginal representations of actions is best understood in terms of the mechanisms of motor control. A two stage theory of motor imagery is proposed in which the first stage, the generation of a prototypical action is virtually identical to that involved in overt actions whilst the second stage depends on the retrieval of sensory impressions from memory.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (84)

  • Measures of explicit and implicit in motor learning: what we know and what we don't

    2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    One of the central ideas in the current review is that explicit knowledge of motor processes is complex, possibly involving different sorts of access to multiple underlying processes. Indeed, several authors explored in detail the complex interactions between our explicit knowledge and our motor skills (Annett, 1985; Annett, 1995; Annett, 1996; Stanley and Krakauer, 2013; Krakauer, 2019). To advance a specific complexity, we distinguish an ability to describe the strategy I am currently applying from an ability to deliberately choose to implement it or stop using it (Hadjiosif and Krakauer, 2020; Maresch et al., 2020).

  • Is imagery better than reality? Performance in imagined dart throwing

    2019, Human Movement Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, one may also more drastically argue, in accordance with the propositional view, that MI makes no use of the motor system, is based on tacit knowledge, and only an epiphenomenon of other, abstract mental processes (Pylyshyn, 2002). In this view, MI is performed by drawing on abstract knowledge about the movement and its previous consequences, but the subjective experience of mentally performing it has no causal relation to the mentally unfolding action (Annett, 1996). For instance, if one knows that one’s own skills are limited, one may intentionally incorporate errors into MI rather than detecting errors based on a simulation.

  • Imagine squeezing a cactus: Cortical activation during affective motor imagery measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy

    2018, Brain and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    Especially area S2 may constitute parts of a circuit that predicts the outcome of our interactions with nearby objects to facilitate action planning. Annett (1996) proposed that during MI, not only motor execution but also prospective sensory feedback generated by overt actions were simulated. In addition, previous studies suggest that the effect of MI practice would be increased by feeling the sensations in association with the actual execution (Guillot, Lebon, & Collet, 2010; Holmes & Collins, 2001).

  • Regional variability in late Lower Paleolithic Amudian blade technology: Analyzing new data from Qesem, Tabun and Yabrud I

    2016, Quaternary International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nevertheless, the fact that the results of the separately conducted attribute analysis of the three laminar types, CTEs and cores from Yabrud I-15 (Shimelmitz, 2009:227–300) showed similar patterns (e.g. the frequent use of removals from core bases) demonstrates the importance of the assemblage in displaying specific technological choices despite its limitations. Altogether, our results indicate that most of the technological procedures and choices made throughout the different steps of the reduction sequence appear at all three sites, indicating that the knappers shared the same ‘know-how’ (e.g. Parker and Milbrath, 1993; Annet, 1996) regarding laminar production and similar concepts of the product properties. There were however differences between the three sites in the frequencies of using specific technological procedures and choices along the reduction sequence.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text