Elsevier

Vitamins & Hormones

Volume 92, 2013, Pages 243-257
Vitamins & Hormones

Chapter Nine - The Influence of Estrogen Therapies on Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women with Anorexia Nervosa and Amenorrhea

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410473-0.00009-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Low bone mineral density is one of the primary risks of chronic amenorrhea, and the effects of potentially long-term menstrual disruption on bone mass are serious concerns for individuals with a past or current anorexia nervosa (AN) diagnosis. As such, estrogen therapies are frequently used to address amenorrhea associated with AN. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to examine the effectiveness of estrogen therapies on bone mineral density in women with amenorrhea. Data regarding the effectiveness of oral contraceptives were of low quality and mixed, with the majority of studies finding no benefit of these treatments on bone mineral density. Hormone replacement therapy findings were also mixed, though promising results were found in a study comparing transdermal administration of physiologic estrogen, delivered in developmentally sensitive incremental doses to placebo controls. Though this study suggests a possible role for estrogen therapies in addressing bone density loss in women with AN, in general, more studies are needed. Clinical drawbacks of using these therapies in the treatment of AN, including the loss of menses resumption as a clinical marker for weight and nutritional rehabilitation, must be considered in the decision to use estrogen therapies, particularly given the uncertain effectiveness of most of these treatments.

Introduction

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a dangerous condition marked by extreme weight loss and malnutrition. An estimated 1.2 million Americans are afflicted with AN, a group that predominantly comprises adolescent and young adult females. Given that this disorder is so disproportionately diagnosed in premenopausal females, amenorrhea due to AN-related weight loss is a significant concern in the medical management of the disorder. Disrupted menstrual function is a particularly pervasive consequence of AN, with even after full recovery, only 35–86% of patients regaining normal weight status and menstrual function (Herzog et al., 1988, Strober et al., 1997).

As low bone mineral density is one of the primary risks of chronic amenorrhea, the effects of potentially long-term menstrual disruption on bone mass are serious concerns for individuals with a past or current AN diagnosis. Further, given that adolescence is both a time of significant bone mass development, as well as the most common time for AN onset, effects of AN-related amenorrhea can be exponentially deleterious in this population. In fact, after controlling for duration of amenorrhea, women who have a history of adolescent AN have been found to have lower bone mass density in adulthood as compared with women who had adult AN (Biller et al., 1989).

Comparitive studies have further confirmed that patients with AN have significantly lower bone mineral density than normal controls (Rigotti et al., 1984, Ward et al., 1997). On average, approximately 50% of adolescents with AN have bone mass density Z-scores lower than − 1at one site at least (Misra et al., 2004, Misra et al., 2004). Further, AN patients have been found to have a significantly higher rate of bone fractures as compared to the general population (Rigotti, Neer, Skates, Herzog, & Nussbaum, 1991). Some studies estimate that more than 40% of patients with long-term anorexia will have fracturing as a result of their low weight status and related low bone density (Herzog et al., 1993).

Section snippets

Estrogen Therapy and Bone Mass

In general, research has shown that weight restoration and successful elimination of AN symptoms are the most effective interventions in eliminating further bone density reduction (e.g., Olmos et al., 2010). Results suggest, however, that not all bone loss is effectively reversed by weight gain and that residual deficits in bone mass density can persist even following full weight restoration and recovery (e.g., Misra et al., 2008, Olmos et al., 2010). Therefore, efforts have also been made to

Potential Clinical Drawbacks of Estrogen Therapy for Patients with AN

The lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of estrogen therapies on the treatment of amenorrhea is of particular concern given the potential drawbacks of using these interventions on patients with AN. Primarily of concern, in the treatment of AN resumption of regular menstruation is a valuable clinical marker, signifying weight restoration has progressed to a point sufficient for healthy functioning. Utilizing estrogen therapies to artificially induce menstruation eliminates this indicator

Influence of Oral Contraceptives on Bone Mineral Density

With regard to the effectiveness of estrogen therapy administered through oral contraceptives, there were five studies, including three RCTs and two prospective cohort studies (i.e., Golden et al., 2002, Grinspoon et al., 2002, Hergenroeder et al., 1997, Munoz-Calvo et al., 2007, Strokosch et al., 2006). Across the studies, oral contraceptives were dosed at 25–35 μg of ethinyl estradiol. Of these studies, one RCT (Hergenroeder et al., 1997) found evidence that oral contraceptives significantly

Influence of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Bone Mineral Density

Three RCTs have evaluated the effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of amenorrhea-related bone loss. HRT dosing and composition varied by study and are summarized in Table 9.1. Similar to the findings regarding oral contraceptives, these studies produced somewhat discrepant results.

One RCT of amenorrheic athletes without AN (Gibson, Mitchell, Reeve, & Harries, 1999) found some gains in bone mass at both the lumbar vertebrae and hip for participants dosed with HRT.

The Role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 and Estrogen on Bone Mineral Density

As highlighted in the Misra et al. study, which used a low dose of estrogen titrated to mimic puberty to reduce the IGF-1 suppressant effects of high doses of estrogen, it has been hypothesized that oral contraceptives may have an IGF-1 suppressive effect, which, in combination with the fact that IGF-1 is already depressed in an underweight population, potentially explains the small to negligible effectiveness of these therapies (Misra & Klibanski, 2011). Inconclusive and inconsistent findings

Implications

These trials represent the strongest findings on the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in increasing bone mass in premenopausal women with amenorrhea. In general, however, the quality of evidence from these studies is low, using the GRADE system of classification (Guyatt et al., 2006) (please refer to Table 9.2, Table 9.3 for a summary of the quality of included RCTs and cohort studies). Also of concern, side effects were rarely discussed in these studies. This oversight limits direct

References (29)

  • S.K. Grinspoon et al.

    Prevalence and predictive factors for regional osteopenia in women with anorexia nervosa

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (2000)
  • G. Guyatt et al.

    An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

    ACP Journal Club

    (2006)
  • C.A. Haberland et al.

    A physician survey of therapy for exercise associated amenorrhea: A brief report

    Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

    (1995)
  • D.B. Herzog et al.

    Outcome in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A review of the literature

    The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text