Elsevier

Injury

Volume 31, Issue 5, 1 June 2000, Pages 353-358
Injury

The aetiology and epidemiology of clavicular fractures: A prospective study during a two-year period in Uppsala, Sweden

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00312-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In a prospective study, the age- and gender-specific incidence and features of clavicular fractures were studied during 1989 and 1990. The population at risk consisted of about 200,000 individuals aged 15 or above in the county of Uppsala, Sweden. There were 187 clavicular fractures in 185 patients corresponding to an annual incidence of 50/100,000 (males 71/100,000, women 30/100,000). Males were significantly younger and sustained comminuted fractures more often than women. The fracture incidence decreased with age in both genders, although the reduction was significant only in men. Bicycle accidents most frequently caused clavicular fractures in both genders, whereas sports activities were significantly more common in men. Right and left clavicles were almost as frequently fractured, and a direct fall on the shoulder was the most frequent mechanism of injury for both genders. There was no difference between genders in the anatomical location with about three of four fractures occurring through the middle part and one of four through the acromial part of the clavicle. Ninety-five percent healed uneventfully, while non-union developed in 5% — evenly distributed between the middle part of the clavicle and the acromial part.

Introduction

Clavicular fractures are frequent injuries as they constitute approximately 4% of all fractures in adults and about 35% of all fractures that occur in the shoulder region. Of fractures in the shoulder region it is only fractures through the proximal humerus that are more common in adults [1], [2]. Only a few studies describing the aetiology and epidemiology of clavicular fractures have been published, and to the best of our knowledge none of the previously published reports have been prospective [1], [3], [4].

The aim with this prospective study was to define the age- and gender-specific incidence with correlation to seasonal changes and with special reference to differences between genders. We also set out to define fracture causes, the fracture site distribution of the clavicle and the incidence of non-union during a two-year period in a well-defined population.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

During a two-year period (1 January 1989 to 31 December 1990), all patients living in the county of Uppsala, Sweden, with a radiologically verified fracture of the clavicle were prospectively included in the present study. Throughout the study period, there were 11 radiological departments within the county, all of which participated in the study. Data on all patients, 15 years of age or older, with a radiographically verified fracture of the clavicle were sent to one of the authors (J. Nowak).

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney non-parametric test, chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, unpaired t test, contingency table analysis and ANOVA with Fisher’s post hoc test were used to compare groups. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Mean and standard deviations are given.

Results

During 1989 (n=95) and 1990 (n=92), there were 187 clavicular fractures in 185 patients above 15 years of age, with a male/female distribution of 2.2:1. The annual incidence was 50.3/100,000 for the entire population with a significant higher incidence in men (71.1/100,000) compared with women (30.5/100,000) (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the annual incidence or gender distribution between the two years.

Patients who suffered a fracture through the acromial or middle part of

Discussion

The finding that clavicular fractures are more frequent in men is in accordance with previous studies where a male predominance between 1.4:1 and 3.6:1 have been reported [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

The overall incidence was fairly similar in this study to a retrospective study from the southern part of Sweden [1], while almost twice as high as the incidence reported in the Edinburgh area in a retrospective study by Robinson [3]. The incidence was highest in the youngest part of the

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Margareta Holgersson for the statistical analysis.

References (24)

  • A. Nordqvist et al.

    The incidence of fractures of the clavicle

    Clin. Orthop

    (1994)
  • F. van Empel et al.

    Epidemiological study of acute shoulder injuries in the casualty department

    Acta Orthop. Scand

    (1986)
  • C. Robinson

    Fractures of the clavicle in the adult

    J. Bone Joint Surgery (Br)

    (1998)
  • F. van der Valk

    Epidemiology of clavicular fractures

    Acta Orthop. Scand

    (1986)
  • H.J. Refior et al.

    Clavicular fracture and its therapy

    Monatsschr. Unfallheilkd

    (1970)
  • A. Eskola et al.

    Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients

    Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg

    (1986)
  • H. Erberle

    Claviculafracturen Klinik und Behandlung der frischen Fraktur

    Hefte zer unfall heil kunde

    (1973)
  • J. Blömer et al.

    Ergebnisse konservativ und operativ behandelter Schlüsselbein brüche

    Unfallheilkunde

    (1977)
  • P.J. Paffen et al.

    Surgical treatment of clavicular fractures with Kirschner wires: a Comparative study

    Arch. Chir. Neerl

    (1978)
  • D. Stanley et al.

    The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis

    J. Bone Joint Surg

    (1988)
  • H. Mallmin et al.

    Incidence of Colle’s fracture in Uppsala. A prospective study of a quarter-million population

    Acta Orthop. Scand

    (1992)
  • W.L. Grundill et al.

    Bicycle accident injuries

    S. Afr. Med. J

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text