Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 16, Issue 3, December 2002, Pages 249-254
Gait & Posture

Comparison of hip and knee muscle moments in subjects with and without knee pain

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00009-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Elderly subjects with and without knee pain walked at a comfortable pace during gait analysis. Comparison of peak hip and knee internal extensor generalized muscle moments (GMMs) during loading response was made between groups. Walking velocity, peak hip internal extensor GMM, and knee range of motion (ROM) were significantly less for the group with knee pain than for the group without pain. Peak hip internal extensor GMM was strongly correlated with velocity, but peak knee internal extensor GMM was not. Knee ROM limitations may account for the increased peak knee internal extensor GMM in the knee pain group.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a condition that involves the destruction of articular cartilage, especially in weight-bearing joints (e.g. knee). It is the most common type of arthritis in elderly and it interferes with independent functioning [1]. It is estimated that 80% of the population over the age of 55 have radiographic changes consistent with knee OA [2]. Messier et al. [3] found that people with knee OA exhibit gait deficits such as decreased walking velocity, stride length, cadence, knee range of motion (ROM), and angular velocity, and initial maximal vertical forces relative to age-, mass-, and gender-matched control subjects.

These gait changes are suggestive of pain relieving alterations to reduce loading of painful joints. Reducing the loading of painful joints, however, may necessitate increased use of other joints to compensate for limitations imposed by pain. Messier [4] suggested that subjects with knee OA often accomplish the walking task through the use of a hip compensatory mechanism. His group found that while knee angular velocity decreased, hip angular velocity increased [3]. Similar compensations using internal generalized muscle moments (GMMs) data have been documented in subjects with knee OA during the sit-to-stand movement in which hip extensor GMM were increased during phases of substantial reductions in knee extensor GMM [5].

While no work directly compared sagittal plane internal GMMs in subjects with knee OA and age-matched controls, Fisher et al. [6] reported that subjects with knee OA predominately lacked knee internal extensor GMM during early stance (loading response), indicating a ‘quadriceps avoidance’ pattern due to weak quadriceps. Quadriceps weakness has been well documented in subjects with OA [3], [7] and is considered to contribute to both symptoms and structural deterioration [8]. Messier [4] suggested that the ‘quadriceps avoidance’ pattern was used by subjects with knee OA who had limited knee flexion throughout the stance phase; thereby avoiding any knee flexion that would require eccentric control via the quadriceps muscles. This eccentric contraction of the quadriceps muscles requires more control and also tends to increase the compressive forces on the knee joint [9]. The lack of knee internal extensor GMM, however, creates an unstable knee if external varus moments are not correspondingly decreased [10]. In order to stabilize the varusly deformed knee, knee flexors may be utilized [10] which may necessitate increased use of hip internal extensor GMM to maintain upright stance during the loading response, similar to the increase in hip internal extensor GMM during phases of substantial reduction in knee extensor GMM observed in the sit-to-stand movement [5]. Fisher et al. [6], however, did not present hip internal extensor GMM patterns during this phase of gait. Radin et al. [9] suggested that while tending to unload painful joints, there is the risk of simultaneously loading other joints abnormally. Kinematic [3] and kinetic [6] data from the literature suggest that the hip may be compensating for the painful and weakened knee, which is commonly observed in subjects with OA, but no data have been reported to confirm this hypothesis. During the loading response phase of gait, the knee joint moves into flexion requiring an increase in the extensor GMM in order to control the joint and prevent it from collapsing into further flexion. Additionally, a hip internal extensor GMM is present at initial contact to maintain the trunk in an upright position, countering momentum from the swing phase. The hip internal extensor GMM increases to peak during the loading response phase to cause hip extension which occurs during the first half of stance. Altered angular velocity patterns at the knee and hip are suggestive of compensatory mechanisms for pain relief, but kinematics alone do not provide evidence for altered motor control patterns, which are provided by the GMM data. An expected increase in internal GMM at the hip is presumed to be a compensatory mechanism to keep the trunk in an upright position and, thus maximizing stability of the lower limb while minimizing knee pain by compensating for reduced internal GMMs [4]. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to compare peak hip and knee internal extensor GMM during loading response between subjects with and without knee pain.

Section snippets

Subjects

Ten community-dwelling men with the diagnosis of knee OA and ten non-symptomatic (NS) community-dwelling age-matched men were recruited from the outpatient clinics and staff of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System—West Los Angeles Healthcare Center. The NS group was not labeled ‘normal’ since no knee radiographs were taken to confirm presence or lack of OA. Despite possible radiographic changes, individuals did not present with pain or symptoms consistent with knee OA and therefore,

Results

Average patterns of hip and knee internal GMM for the entire gait cycle (initial contact to initial contact) for each group are presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Positive values represent internal extensor GMM for both joints, while negative values represent internal flexor GMM for both joints. The loading response phase occurred within approximately the first 12% of the gait cycle. Comparisons between limbs did not demonstrate significant differences across limbs within either group so

Discussion

Contrary to Messier's [4] speculation, there was not a compensatory increase in hip internal extensor GMM during the loading response phase for a decrease in knee internal extensor GMM. Subjects with knee OA maintained similar peak knee internal extensor GMM, but had reduced hip internal extensor GMM, which was related to the reduced walking velocity observed in the subjects with knee OA. Factors which may explain these results focus on the issues of ROM differences and the optimization of gait

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System—West Los Angeles Healthcare Center and the PM&R Gait Laboratory staff for graciously allowing us to use their facility and equipment for the completion of this study. We would also like to thank Julie Hershberg BS for all of her contributions to this project and to Emmanuel Guerrero MD for assisting in recruitment and medical evaluation of the subjects with OA. This project was done in partial fulfillment of the MPT degree from

References (22)

  • N.M. Fisher et al.

    Muscle function and gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis before and after muscle rehabilitation

    Disabil. Rehabil.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Knee biomechanics and contralateral knee osteoarthritis progression after total knee arthroplasty

      2022, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, both groups landed with knee in a flexed position at initial contact and did not come to full knee extension at midstance, which has shown to be common in this population [7,10]. This supports previous work that found that gait patterns after TKA do not return to normal; often patients continue to walk with flexed knee gait patterns with attenuated sagittal plane motion on the operated side [34]. While this may contribute to residual functional deficits, alterations in the joint loading environment [35], as well as risk of contralateral TKA, it did not appear to be a risk for radiographic changes based on KL scores (Table 3).

    • Kinematic changes in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis are a result of reduced walking speed rather than disease severity

      2020, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, patients with knee OA typically walk at slower walking speed and with shorter stride length [5,6], lower cadence [6–9] and longer stride duration [5,7,8] than asymptomatic groups. Moreover, patients with knee OA have been reported to have greater peak knee flexion at initial contact [10–12] and lower knee flexion during stance and swing phase [5,13] than controls. In addition, observed differences in adjacent joints in patients with severe knee OA include smaller ankle range of motion (ROM) and lower peak hip extension [5].

    • Effect of altered sagittal-plane knee kinematics on loading during the early stance phase of gait

      2019, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, KFE in LF and IF conditions showed greater values compared to the set value of 32%. However, it may be applicable because variables were within those reported for OA-related alterations of knee kinematics [8–10,12,13,15–17]. This study revealed the effects of altered sagittal knee kinematics during the early stance phase of gait on knee load.

    • Clinical and Spatiotemporal Gait Effects of Canes in Hip Osteoarthritis

      2012, PM and R
      Citation Excerpt :

      The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT 00506714. To perform spatiotemporal gait analysis [17,18], we used a high-resolution, computer-based, 6-camera Falcon 3-D optical motion capture system (Motion Analysis Corp, Santa Rosa, CA) to collect kinematic (60 Hz) data during walking; 3-dimensional gait analysis has been shown to have good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for the measurement of spatiotemporal gait variables [19]. Retroreflective markers were placed bilaterally on the dorsal surface of the shoe representing the head of the first metatarsal, on the posterior surface of the shoe representing the posterior calcaneus, on the lateral malleolus just above where the shoe ends, lateral femoral condyle (on skin), anterior superior iliac spine (on shorts), sacrum (on shorts), acromion process (on skin), lateral humeral epicondyle (on skin), ulnar head (on skin), mid-thigh (on skin), and mid-shank (on skin) for gait analysis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text