The AFL penetrometer study: Work in progress

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80032-3Get rights and content

Five hundred and seventy one matches in the Australian Football League [AFL] had ground hardness measured using a Penetrometer, over the period 1997-2000. The method used was 3 drops at each of 20 locations over the playing field on the morning before games. Anterior Cruciate Ligament [ACL] injuries were recorded using an ongoing injury surveillance system. There was a non-significant trend towards a higher risk of ACL injury when the 3-drop average of the Penetrometer was less (harder) than 4.5cm, RR 2.36 (95% CI 0.90–6.24). When the first drop average of the Penetrometer was less (harder) than 2.5cm, the relative risk was 2.60 (95% CI 0.94–7.20). There was also a non-significant trend towards an increased risk of ACL injury in games where the predominant grass type was couch (Bermuda) grass, as opposed to rye grass, RR 2.37 (95% CI 0.89–6.36). This study confirms previous findings from the AFL that early season matches and matches played at northern (warmer) venues have a higher risk of ACL injury. It is likely that ground-related variables are partially responsible for these observations, but to date, the relative contributions of ground hardness, grass type, shoe-surface traction and other confounding factors are not certain. There was a significant fall in the number of ACL injuries in the AFL (to approximately half the previous level of incidence) during seasons 1999 and 2000. It is possible that reaction to this study and related publicity has led to the preparation of ground conditions in the AFL that are less likely to produce ACL injuries.

References (31)

  • AlsopJ. et al.

    Temporal Patterns of Injury During a Rugby Season

    Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

    (2000)
  • AndresenB. et al.

    High school football injuries: Field conditions and other factors

    Wisconsin Medical Journal

    (1989)
  • ArendtE. et al.

    Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Patterns Among Collegiate Men and Women

    Journal of Athletic Training

    (1999)
  • BakerS.

    Temporal variation of selected mechanical properties of natural turf football pitches

    Journal of the Sports Turf Research Institute

    (1991)
  • BellM. et al.

    The Playing Quality of Association Football Pitches

    Journal of the Sports Turf Research Institute

    (1988)
  • BramwellS. et al.

    High school football injuries: a pilot comparison of playing surfaces

    Medicine and Science in Sports

    (1971)
  • BrinerW. et al.

    Volleyball Injuries at the 1995 United States Olympic Festival

    International Journal of Volleyball Research

    (1999)
  • CanawayP. et al.

    Standards for the Playing Quality of Natural Turf for Association Football. Natural and Artificial Playing Fields: Characteristics and Safety Features.

  • de LoesM. et al.

    A 7-year study on risks and costs of knee injuries in male and female youth participants in 12 sports

    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

    (2000)
  • DunnJ. et al.

    Bermudagrass and Cool-Season Turfgrass Mixtures: Response to Stimulated Traffic

    Agronomy Journal

    (1994)
  • EkstrandJ. et al.

    Surface-related injuries in soccer

    Sports medicine

    (1989)
  • EttingerC. et al.

    A method to help reduce the risk of serious knee sprains incurred in alpine skiing

    American Journal of Sports Medicine

    (1995)
  • FordP.

    Ground Hardness Measurement

    Golf & Sports Turf Australia

    (1999)
  • HawkinsR. et al.

    The association football medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football

    British Journal of Sports Medicine

    (2001)
  • HennekensC. et al.

    Epidemiology in Medicine

  • Cited by (51)

    • Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury as a Function of Gender, Sport, and Injury-Reduction Programs

      2018, The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Reconstruction and Basic Science: Second Edition
    • Mechanisms for regulating step length while running towards and over an obstacle

      2016, Human Movement Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Runners were given at least 10–15 m before and after the curb to reach and maintain a self-selected running speed and style. The surface stiffness was measured with an impulse force hammer (Kistler 9726A) that was modified to measure the deceleration of a free falling mass (hammer) from a set height (40 cm) onto a surface (following Clegg, 1976; Nigg & Yeadon, 1987; Orchard, 2001; Pinnington & Dawson, 2001; Sifers & Beard, 1997). The output can be used to measure the stiffness or peak impact deceleration force exerted by the surface.

    • Can the natural turf pitch be viewed as a risk factor for injury within Association Football?

      2016, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      Within football objective measures of pitch hardness derived from devices such as the Clegg hammer8–11 have been reported but no studies have linked the values to the incidence of injuries. Other sports have used equipment such as the Clegg hammer,18,22,23 or the Penetrometer22,24–26 to gain objective measurements of hardness though a lack of consistency with respect to the equipment and protocols used impacts on transferability and applicability.22 Consequently, the available research may not have (a) effectively determined a true representation of the pitch hardness or (b) evaluated how this variable may directly influence the risk of injury.

    • The relationship between ground conditions and injury: What level of evidence do we have?

      2013, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ground conditions were not significantly associated with injury risk and injuries were most frequently associated with grounds considered OK (40.2%), followed by soft (29.5%) and hard (11.5%) grounds. Overall, studies in Australian Rules football have demonstrated a non significant relationship between ground conditions and injuries.5,10,40,41 Interestingly studies with elite AFL players (that objectively measured ground conditions) identified an increased risk when ground conditions were classified as harder, which is in contrast to junior level where injuries were most frequently associated with firm, OK or soft grounds.

    • Ground hardness and injury in community level Australian football

      2012, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text