Original article
Intraobserver Reliability of Angular and Linear Measurements of Scapular Position in Subjects With and Without Symptoms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Lewis JS, Valentine RE. Intraobserver reliability of angular and linear measurements of scapular position in subjects with and without symptoms.

Objective

To assess intraobserver reliability of angular and linear clinical measurements of scapular position.

Design

Test-retest analyses.

Setting

Outpatient department in National Health Service teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.

Participants

Subjects (n=45) without symptoms (21 men, 24 women; age range, 23–56y) and 45 subjects (22 men, 23 women; age range, 19–84y) with shoulder symptoms (defined as pain in the C5-6 dermatome reproduced by shoulder movement and not reproduced with cervical movement).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) models 2,1 and 2,3, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and SE of measurements for 68% confidence and 2 SEs of measurement (for the 95% CI) for the bilateral angular measurements of scapular rotation and tilt, and the bilateral linear measurements of lateral scapular displacement (protraction) and vertical displacement (elevation).

Results

For subjects without symptoms, ICC2,3 results ranged from .75 to .98. The 2 SE results for the angular movements ranged from 1.8° to 2.4° and from 0.4 to 1.0cm for the direct linear measurements. Subjects with symptoms: ICC2,3 results ranged from .61 to .98. The 2 SE results for the angular movements ranged from 1.4° to 2° and from 0.6 to 1cm for the direct linear measurements.

Conclusions

Repeated-measure (ICC2,3) results were more reliable than single-measure (ICC2,1) results. Very good to excellent intraobserver reliability was demonstrated for the angular and linear measurements of interest in both shoulders of subjects with and without symptoms. The 2 SE results provide guidance about the error associated with the individual measurements and will assist the clinician determining whether a change in the static position of the scapula has occurred as a result of intervention or over time. (National Research Register identifier N0060148286.)

Section snippets

Participants

Subjects with symptoms were recruited through the orthopedic and physical therapy outpatient department in the teaching hospital where the study was conducted. Symptoms included pain in the C5-6 dermatome at rest or reproduced on shoulder movement and not influenced by cervical movement. Because this study involved the reliability of measuring scapular position, subjects with acute and chronic conditions with varying durations and severities were included. Subjects with symptoms were assessed

Results

Forty-five subjects without symptoms (21 men [47%]; 24 women [53%]; combined mean age, 32y; range, 23–56y; mean height, 1.7m; range, 1.6–1.9m; mean weight, 70.4kg; range, 50–110kg) were recruited. Forty-five subjects with symptoms were recruited (22 men [49%]; 23 women [51%]; combined mean age, 43y; range, 19–84y; mean height, 1.7m; range, 1.5–1.9m; mean weight, 71.4kg; range, 49–90kg). Diagnostic categories for the subjects with symptoms included nonspecific shoulder pain (n=21), rotator cuff

Discussion

Although assessment of scapular position is considered to be an important component of the clinical examination of the shoulder, conflicting clinical and research findings1, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 29, 30, 31 suggest further investigations are necessary. To date, no study known to us has investigated the reliability of a series of static angular and linear clinical measurements of the scapula. In addition, we are unaware of any study that has measured scapular tilt using a simple clinical procedure.

Conclusions

Poor scapular posture and movement have been suggested as mechanisms in the pathogenesis of a number of shoulder pathologies. Although this is yet to be proven, many clinicians believe that the clinical assessment of scapular position is an essential part of the clinical examination of the shoulder. The findings of the current study provide clinicians with clinically accessible measurements to determine the static and angular position of the scapula (when the arm is by the side) in subjects

Acknowledgment

We thank the members of the physiotherapy outpatient department at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital for their support of this investigation.

References (43)

  • P.W. McClure et al.

    Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2001)
  • L. McKenna et al.

    Inter-tester reliability of scapular position in junior elite swimmers

    Phys Ther Sport

    (2004)
  • O. Grimsby et al.

    Interrelation of the spine to the shoulder girdle

  • W.B. Kibler

    The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function

    Am J Sports Med

    (1998)
  • S. Sahrmann

    Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes

    (2002)
  • F. Kendall et al.

    Muscle testing and function

    (1993)
  • W. Kibler

    Role of the scapula in the overhead throwing motion

    Contemp Orthop

    (1991)
  • S.D. Bagg et al.

    A biomechanical analysis of scapular rotation during arm abduction in the scapular plane

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (1988)
  • L. Freedman et al.

    Abduction of the arm in the scapular plane: scapular and gleno-humeral movements: a roentgenographic study

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1966)
  • N.K. Poppen et al.

    Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1978)
  • S.G. Doody et al.

    Shoulder movements during abduction in the scapular plane

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1970)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Test-retest reliability of posture measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

      2018, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have examined the reliability of posture measurements among healthy participants with radiographs [32], photographs [33], and electrogoniometer [34]. Different posture indices have been examined including the posture of the head [35], trunk [36], shoulders [37], and lower limbs [38]. No clear consensus concerning the reliability of posture measurement exists among studies.

    • Comparing non-invasive scapular tracking methods across elevation angles, planes of elevation and humeral axial rotations

      2017, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The scapula is a broad, irregular bone with no fixed mechanical center of rotation and substantial amounts of overlying soft tissue (Hebert et al., 2000; Klopcar and Lenarcic, 2006; van Andel et al., 2009). Skin motion that occurs over the scapula makes it challenging to collect accurate measurement of 3D scapular motion (Karduna et al., 2001), and some research continues to focus on quantifying levels of intra- and interrater reliability of physical examination methods measuring scapular position (Baertschi et al., 2013; Lewis and Valentine, 2008; McClure et al., 2009; Nijs et al., 2005). Invasive methods, including subcutaneous bone pins and implanted radiopaque media have been described as the “gold standard” method of scapular tracking as the instrumentation directly contacts the shoulder bones (Bourne et al., 2009; Högfors et al., 1991; Karduna et al., 2001; Ludewig et al., 2009; McClure et al., 2001).

    • The reliability of physical examination tests for the clinical assessment of scapular dyskinesis in subjects with shoulder complaints: A systematic review

      2017, Physical Therapy in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      Characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table A1. All included studies were prospective and intrarater reliability in four (Juul-Kristensen et al., 2011; J. S.; Lewis & Valentine, 2007, 2008; Watson et al., 2005), interrater reliability was assessed in seven (Baertschi et al., 2013; Curtis & Roush, 2006; P.; McClure et al., 2009; Nijs et al., 2005; Rabin et al., 2006; Terwee et al., 2005; Uhl et al., 2009), and both types of reliability in four studies (Kibler et al., 2002; Odom et al., 2001; Shadmehr et al., 2010; Struyf, Meeus et al., 2014). In twelve out of fifteen publications studies were conducted in primary (Baertschi et al., 2013; Curtis & Roush, 2006; J. S.; Lewis & Valentine, 2008; P.; McClure et al., 2009; Nijs et al., 2005; Odom et al., 2001; Rabin et al., 2006; Shadmehr et al., 2010; Struyf, Meeus, et al., 2014; Terwee et al., 2005; Uhl et al., 2009; Watson et al., 2005), one in secondary (J. S. Lewis & Valentine, 2007) and two in undefined care settings (Juul-Kristensen et al., 2011; Kibler et al., 2002).

    • Scapular balance angle reference values in a healthy population

      2014, Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia
    • Reliability of physical examination tests used in the assessment of patients with shoulder problems: A systematic review

      2010, Physiotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      A large number of studies were initially identified through the search strategy, many of which were not deemed to be relevant after review of abstracts or full articles. Finally, 36 studies [37–72] that met the inclusion criteria and had been identified by the search strategy were included. Fig. 1 provides a flow diagram of the selection process.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Westminster Medical School Research Trust and the Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare National Health Service Trust Charity.

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text