The results of 163 Achilles tendon ruptures treated by a minimally invasive surgical technique and functional aftertreatment
Introduction
In the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) many authors advocate a surgical approach, especially in the young and physically active patient.4, 8, 11, 17, 30, 31 Since the first description of a minimally invasive operative technique for treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture by Ma and Griffith in 1977, minimally invasive surgery for ATR has gained popularity and various modifications of the technique have followed.1, 4, 6, 15 Regardless of the surgical technique, cast immobilisation has been the most popular method of post-operative treatment until now. However, there is a tendency towards mobilisation and full weight bearing soon after operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture, with various authors reporting good results.3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 16, 18, 23, 24
Theoretically, a treatment strategy consisting of both a minimally invasive procedure while allowing a liberal post-operative regime would represent the ‘best of both worlds’. Although minimally invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture has gained popularity, little evidence is available on the safety of the technique, especially in combination with a functional aftertreatment. We present the results of a combination of minimally invasive surgical repair combined with a functional post-operative regime allowing full weight bearing. The minimally invasive technique applied in this study was a modification of the technique described by Ma and Griffith: instead of 6 stab incisions, a small horizontal incision was used, and the suture was guided through the calcaneus.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a treatment protocol for Achilles tendon ruptures consisting of a minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair combined with early full weight bearing.
Section snippets
Design
The study was designed as a prospective multi-centre clinical trial. Primary end point was the incidence of re-rupture, the functional outcome and the duration of sick leave concerning work and sports.
Secondary end points were the incidence of other complications after minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair, such as wound-infection and sural nerve neuralgia, and the subjective evaluation by the patient.
Patients
The data were collected prospectively in one university hospital and five teaching
Results
Between May 1998 and February 2004, 163 consecutive patients were included, 128 men (79%) and 35 women (21%). Three patients (1.8%) were lost to follow-up, one died and two patients moved to other countries. The age was between 22 and 76 years (mean 38 years) and in 83% of the cases the injury was sports-related. We tried to operate on all patients within 24 h of rupture (mean 1 day, range: 1–4 days) and were able to leave the hospital within 0 (same day admission) to 17 days (median: 2). The
Discussion
There is still controversy about the management of subcutaneous Achilles tendon ruptures. Although most authors prefer surgical repair because of the high re-rupture rate after conservative management.8, 11, 17, 30, 31 Some authors prefer the conservative management concept because of the prevention of the typical complications associated with open surgery.19
Khan et al. showed that complications typically associated with open repair can be avoided by percutaneous tendon sutures without an
Conclusion
The minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair combined with a functional rehabilitation program has been shown to be a safe and quick procedure with a low rate of re-ruptures, quick return to work and sports and a high level of patient satisfaction. We consider the outcome as a support for this procedure and its post-operative mobilisation regimen.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript in one way or another. The completion of this manuscript has been achieved in order to contribute to the knowledge of the surgical management of trauma.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to kindly thank all participating surgeons and surgical residents of the following hospitals: Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Dr. R.M.J.M. Butzelaar, St. Lucas–Andreas Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam; Drs. A.K.F. Tanka, Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Haarlem; Dr. M.P. Simons, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam; Drs. P.P. Bor, Ziekenhuis Gooi Noord, Blaricum; Dr. J.G. van Baal, Twenteborg Ziekenhuis, Almelo; Drs. R.P. Strating, Ziekenhuis De Heel, Zaandam.
The authors
References (31)
Repair of calcaneal tendon ruptures. A safe technique
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1989)- et al.
Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(2002) - et al.
After care of surgically treated Achilles tendon ruptures: plaster cast or bandage
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
(1988) - et al.
Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures. A comparative study
Am J Sports Med
(1990) - et al.
Wound complications after open Achilles tendon repair: an analysis of risk factors
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(2004) - et al.
Percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Immobilisation versus functional postoperative treatment
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1997) - et al.
Functional postoperative treatment of Achilles tendon repair
Am J Sports Med
(1992) - et al.
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised study and review of the literature
Am J Sports Med
(1993) - et al.
Randomised controlled trials of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for rupture of the tendo Achillis
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(2006) A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achillis. Comparison with open repair
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1995)
Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Vascular distribution in the Achilles tendon; an angiographic and microangiographic study
Acta Chir Scand
Outcome and prognostic factors of Achilles rupture repair using a new scoring method
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon a prospective randomised controlled study
Foot Ankle Int
Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: a new technique
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Cited by (64)
Biomechanical comparisons of three minimally invasive Achilles tendon percutaneous repair suture techniques
2022, Clinical BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :This is minimized by a percutaneous approach with minimal incisions and the suture being passed and tied blindly. In favor of percutaneous repairs decreased incidence of wound complications, fewer infections, reduced operative time, and better cosmetic appearance have been reported (Amlang et al., 2005a; Cretnik et al., 2005; Lansdaal et al., 2007). However, the greatest potential downside to percutaneous repairs might be the strength of the repairs, shown to be significantly weaker than open repairs (Clanton et al., 2015; Haji et al., 2004; Hockenbury and Johns, 1990).
Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures
2021, Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Complications after minimally invasive treatment have been documented, with 19% sural nerve issues and even 8% rerupture.61 Other studies have shown sural nerve injury, ranging from 9% to 18%.70,71 Many of the reports, however, demonstrate a successful resolution of sural nerve problems over time.
Comparison Between Early Functional Rehabilitation and Cast Immobilization After Minimally Invasive Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture
2019, Journal of Foot and Ankle SurgeryFoot and Ankle Surgery: Common Problems and Solutions
2018, Clinics in Sports Medicine