Ability of static and statistical mechanics posturographic measures to distinguish between age and fall risk
Section snippets
Introduction and background
Falling due to a failure in the postural control system because of aging or a specific pathology is a major problem facing the burgeoning population of older adults (Kannus et al., 1999; Rubenstein et al., 1994). Techniques to determine if an individual is at an elevated risk of falling due to deterioration of their postural control system that are sensitive to small deviations from the norm would provide a means for early detection and intervention. Additionally, the effectiveness of remedial
Description of the three groups in the study
We examined three groups of individuals able to maintain unassisted upright stance: young healthy active adults (n: 10; age: 21–29 years; mean: 24.6), older healthy active adults at a “low-risk” of falling (n: 10; age: 68–79 years; mean: 72.6) and older adults at a “high-risk” of falling (n: 10; age: 57–80; mean: 69.1). The young and “low-risk” groups were recruited from the campus of Wake Forest University (WFU) and WFU Cardiac Rehabilitation program, respectively. These subjects had no
Traditional static posturographic analysis
Four traditional parameters were calculated for each subject (averaged over the 10 trials). The reader is referred to Murray et al. (1975), Prieto et al. (1996) and Sokal and Rohlf (1981) for more detailed descriptions of the parameters.
Statistical analysis
COP trajectories were analyzed separately for the AP and ML direction. Parameters describing the COP trajectories were compiled for each subject. Averages and standard deviations of the parameters for each group were calculated. For all the tests, statistical significance was defined as ⩽0.05. Because the parameters for the older adults at “high-risk” often lead to a violation of the homogeneity of variance assumption required for ANOVA, we used non-parametric statistical tests. The
Traditional static posturographic analysis
The averages, standard deviations and results of the statistical analyses for the traditional measures are presented in Table 2. The Kruskal–Wallis tests revealed a significant group main effect for all the traditional measures. In the follow-up tests for age (young compared to “low-risk”), none of the four measures were different, whereas all follow-up tests for fall risk (“low-risk” compared to “high-risk”) were significant.
SDA
The averages of the stabilogram diffusion plots for the three groups
Ability of traditional and statistical mechanics techniques to distinguish between groups
First, we examined the ability of the techniques to distinguish age-related differences by comparing the young and “low-risk” groups. There were no significant differences between the young and “low-risk” groups for any of the traditional measures. However, all four of the statistical mechanics techniques had at least one parameter that exhibited a significant difference between the young and “low-risk” groups. This suggests that statistical mechanics techniques are more sensitive to
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Didier Delignières for sharing Excel macros. Thanks are also due to Jim Collins and Andrea Stamp who shared Matlab code for SDA. We would like to recognize the help of Pete Santago for discussions on statistical mechanics. Lastly, thanks are due to Jim Norris for additional statistical support.
References (24)
- et al.
On the fractal properties of natural human standing
Neuroscience Letters
(2000) - et al.
Can motion of individual body segments identify dynamic instability in the elderly?
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon.)
(2003) - et al.
Aging, muscle activity, and balance controlphysiologic changes associated with balance impairment
Gait & Posture
(2003) - et al.
Mediolateral sway in single-leg stance is the best discriminator of balance performance for Tai-Chi practitioners
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(2003) - et al.
Open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms in Parkinson's diseaseincreased mediolateral activity during quiet standing
Neuroscience Letters
(1995) - et al.
Vibrating insoles and balance control in elderly people
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
A prospective study of laboratory and clinical measures of postural stability to predict community-dwelling fallers
Journal of Gerontology Series A
(2000) - et al.
Open-loop and closed-loop control of posturea random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories
Experimental Brain Research
(1993) - et al.
The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms
Experimental Brain Research
(1995) - et al.
Upright, correlated random walksa statistical-biomechanics approach to the human postural control system
Chaos
(1995)
Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms
Experimental Brain Research
A methodological note on nonlinear time series analysisis the open- and closed-loop model of Collins and De Luca (1993) a statistical artifact?
Journal of Motor Behavior
Cited by (113)
Subsensory electrical noise stimulation applied to the lower trunk improves postural control during visual perturbations
2022, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :Reductions in the AP Path and 95%EA during the AP condition are indicators of improved postural sway. Indeed, larger paths and confidence ellipse areas of the CoP have been linked to increased risk of falling, and are construed as the high-risk situation exhibiting impaired postural control [39,40]. Correlational analyses revealed moderate to strong relationships between the baseline performance measures of APPF50, MLPF50, MLPF95, and EA obtained during the non-stimulation and change due to TS and LS variables.
Do Predictive Relationships Exist Between Postural Control and Falls Efficacy in Unilateral Transtibial Prosthesis Users?
2018, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation