Manipulative Therapy for Lower Extremity Conditions: Expansion of Literature Review
Section snippets
Methods
In conjunction with the CCGPP and with input from included authors, an expanded update of the Hoskins et al1 2006 review was undertaken with a search of the literature conducted using the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; PubMed; Manual, Alternative, and Natural Therapy Index System; Science Direct; and Index to Chiropractic Literature from December 2006 to February 2008. Limits were set to English language, with abstract, and human studies. Search terms including
Results
Of 389 citations identified, 39 were determined to be relevant and supplementary to the clinical or controlled trials previously found by Hoskins et al. Of the 39 studies, 8 pertained to conditions effecting the knee; 1, the hip; 7, the ankle; and 2, the foot. These studies were assessed. The case series and studies previously incorporated in 2006 have not been cited in this investigation; therefore, readers are referred to that review. However, 13 case series and studies excluded and/or not
Discussion
This literature review revealed new, recent, and previously noncited (secondary to limitations previously discussed) publications regarding manipulative treatment, for the most part with, but also without, adjunctive therapy (frequently exercise and/or rehabilitation and soft-tissue therapy, secondarily, in conjunction with modalities, NSAIDS, etc) for lower extremity conditions. There is an increase of limited and fair evidence for use of manipulative therapy in the treatment of a number of
Conclusion
There is a growing number of peer-reviewed, published studies of manipulative therapy for lower extremity disorders. Larger, methodologically improved, and well-funded randomized controlled and clinical trials, as well as observational, clinical, and basic science research, case series, and studies, are both needed and merited. Interdisciplinary collaboration should be encouraged and supported as well. Finally, the basic overarching model of similarity of indications for and beneficial
Acknowledgment
There were no declared conflicts of interest. Authors, independent reviewers, and panelists participated without compensation from any source, company, or organization. Cleveland Chiropractic College made an in-kind contribution to this systematic review by allowing Drs Brantingham and Globe and Ms Hicks to devote a portion of their work time to this project.
References (111)
- et al.
Chiropractic treatment of lower extremity conditions: a literature review
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2006) - et al.
Characteristics of chiropractic practitioners, patients, and encounters in Massachusetts and Arizona
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2005) - et al.
The initial effects of knee joint mobilization on osteoarthritic hyperalgesia
Man Ther
(2007) Manipulative therapy of the foot and ankle: science or mesmerism?
Foot
(1998)- et al.
Effectiveness of exercise therapy and manual mobilisation in ankle sprain and functional instability: a systematic review
Aust J Physiother
(2006) - et al.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(2008) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials
(1996) Conservative chiropractic management of recalcitrant foot pain after fasciotomy: a retrospective case review
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2006)- et al.
Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses
J Clin Epidemiol
(2007) - et al.
Influence of active release technique on quadriceps inhibition and strength: a pilot study
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2004)