Shoulder
Does scapular dyskinesis affect top rugby players during a game season?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.032Get rights and content

Background

Scapular dyskinesis represents a considerable risk of shoulder injury to overhead athletes; however, there is a shortage of detailed epidemiologic information about scapular dyskinesis among the participants in collision sports.

Purpose

To describe the incidence and relationship of scapular dyskinesis to shoulder discomfort and variables related to the shoulder in top rugby players.

Methods

One hundred twenty top rugby football players in Japan were evaluated by means of questionnaires, physical examinations, and a video analysis during their preseason. Data were assessed by a logistic regression analysis calculating odds ratios. The primary outcome was processed to assess the relationship between scapular dyskinesis and other variables at the preseason. The secondary outcome was processed to assess an influence of scapular dyskinesis to shoulder discomfort during their regular season that were reassigned by second questionnaires.

Results

Scapular dyskinesis was identified in 33 (32%) shoulders, and type III was prominent. Scapular dyskinesis was significantly associated with shoulder discomfort (OR [odds ratio] = 4.4), and was also associated with variables of the affected shoulder. In addition, the players with asymptomatic scapular dyskinesis at the preseason would have high incident with shoulder discomfort during their regular season (OR = 3.6).

Conclusions

Scapular dyskinesis was associated significantly with both subjective and objective symptoms of the affected shoulder. These appearances may be of particular relevance in the early screening of chronic shoulder disorders in the rugby population. Further study to investigate and evaluate its reliability is needed to characterize its impact on the participants in collision sports.

Section snippets

Subjects

In 2009, one hundred twenty male roster players for top-league rugby teams in Japan, playing nearly 30 games during a regular season, were enrolled in this study. Twelve of them had participated in international games. Those who had shoulder or elbow surgeries in the past and those with a time-loss injury to shoulder or elbow in the previous 3 months were excluded. Examinations were conducted on both shoulders of each subject.

Demographics of the subjects

Demographic data were collected on all the subjects, using a

Results

The percentage of agreement representing inter-rater reliability in our evaluation of SD was 85.8% (103/120) and the kappa coefficient was .76. They correlated closely with the results reported by Kibler et al.15 Only the subjects whose ratings were in accordance by both raters were used for the final assessment. Consequently, 103 players were subjected to the primary analysis. In the population, SD was observed in 22 right shoulders (21.4%) and 13 (12.6%) left. The right shoulder was often

Discussion

The present study is the first preliminary one dealing with epidemiology of SD in rugby players. Of the top rugby players subjected to the study, SD was evident in 21.4% in the right shoulders and 12.6% in the left. The etiology and pathophysiology of SD would be different between collision sports (ie, rugby) and throwing sports (ie, baseball).14 SD itself can be considered to be an adaptation of the shoulder to the mechanical stress or injury.7, 23 The shoulders of rugby players are more prone

Conclusion

In conclusion, SD before and after a regular season was studied in a group of top-grade rugby players. The presence of SD, even asymptomatic before the season, was proved to be an alarming sign for shoulder problems. Therefore, SD should be further studied for prevention of various “rugby shoulders.”

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Makoto Urushibara, MD, Daisuke Kubota, MD, Yuji Takazawa, MD, Atsushi Kuwata, AT, Shigeru Ooka, AT, Chihiro Ota, AT, Mototsugu Matsui, Shingo Urayama, Koji Nishimoto, and Saya Hirabayashi for their valuable help in the data collection.

Disclaimer

None of the other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References (32)

  • N.J. Fiddian et al.

    The winged scapula

    Clin Orthop

    (1984)
  • E.R. Gozna et al.

    Traumatic winging of the scapula

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1979)
  • J.R. Gregg et al.

    Serratus anterior paralysis in the young athlete

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1979)
  • R.J. Hawkins et al.

    Impingement syndrome in athletes

    Am J Sports Med

    (1980)
  • F.W. Jobe et al.

    Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries

    Am J Sports Med

    (1982)
  • W.B. Kibler

    The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function

    Am J Sports Med

    (1998)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Analysis of the kinetic chain in asymptomatic individuals with and without scapular dyskinesis

      2018, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the cross-sectional nature of most studies (Lawrence et al., 2014; Ludewig and Cook, 2000; Lukasiewicz et al., 1999), the question remains if scapular dyskinesis is cause or consequence of shoulder pain. However, recent prospective studies have showed that individuals with scapular dyskinesis may present with higher risk of developing shoulder pain than those without dyskinesis (Clarsen et al., 2014; Hickey et al., 2017; Kawasaki et al., 2012; Møller et al., 2017). Considering that scapular dyskinesis in interaction with other factors may increase the likelihood of developing shoulder pain, it would be interesting to evaluate if there are alterations in other segments of the kinetic chain, such as trunk and hips, in asymptomatic individuals with and without dyskinesis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Ethics approval: Ethics approval for the study was received from the Juntendo University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (No. 21067).

    View full text