Elsevier

Manual Therapy

Volume 21, February 2016, Pages 134-143
Manual Therapy

Original article
Topographical pressure pain sensitivity maps of the shoulder region in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2015.07.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The topographical map proposed revealed an excellent intra-rater reliability.

  • There is no alteration in mechanical sensitivity in individuals with SAPS.

  • The shoulder area showed a heterogeneous distribution in mechanical sensitivity.

  • Women exhibited higher mechanical sensitivity compared to men.

  • Results would not support the presence of central sensitization in SAPS.

Abstract

Background

Topographical pain maps (TPM) are useful tools to assess deep tissue sensitivity in musculoskeletal pain conditions. There is evidence suggesting bilateral sensitivity in subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), although it is not widely accepted. No previous study has investigated TPM of the shoulder in SAPS.

Objective

To investigate whether differences for TPM of the shoulder are evident among patients with unilateral SAPS and controls.

Methods

Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed 3 times at each point and there was a 20 s rest period between each one. The TPM were calculated using 29 pre-determined points on both shoulders in all groups by inverse distance weighted interpolation of PPT data. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance was applied to detect differences in PPTs between groups, sides, points (gender as covariate).

Results

The results revealed significant differences between points and genders (both, P < 0.001), but not between groups (P = 0.243) and sides (P = 0.812). Heterogeneous distribution of mechanical pain sensitivity was found in both groups as the PPTs were lower on the root spine of the scapula and the posterior border of the acromion (points 5–8, P < 0.05), glenohumeral joint (points 17–20, P < 0.01) and the anterior deltoid muscle (points 21–25, P < 0.001) compared to the average of the other sites on the shoulder. Women exhibited bilateral lower PPTs in all points than men in both groups (all, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study revealed no differences for mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with SAPS experiencing lower levels of pain compared with matched controls, but showed heterogeneous distribution of PPTs in the shoulder.

Introduction

Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders are usually associated with high social and financial costs showing a prevalence of 36.8% of all the cases in the general population (Huissted et al., 2008). Shoulder pain is one of the most common complaints, comprising 16% of all musculoskeletal symptoms (Urwin et al., 1998, Pope et al., 2001), and subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) is the most frequent condition for shoulder pain (Lewis, 2011, Tekavec et al., 2012). The etiology of SAPS is not yet understood, but there is evidence showing inflammation and degeneration of the bursa and rotator cuff tendons on the sub-acromial space (Lewis, 2011, Diercks et al., 2014). Furthermore, alterations in kinematics (Ludewig and Cook, 2000, Timmons et al., 2012), muscle activity/performance (Camargo et al., 2008, Phadke et al., 2009) and the presence of active trigger points (TrPs) (Hidalgo-Lozano et al., 2010, Alburquerque-Sendín et al., 2013) have also been reported.

Several studies have demonstrated the impact of shoulder pain on upper extremity function and health-related quality of life (Camargo et al., 2007, Camargo et al., 2009). There is evidence suggesting the presence of unilateral regional shoulder mechanical hyperalgesia in these patients (Alburquerque-Sendín et al., 2013), whereas multiregional and bilateral shoulder pain hyperalgesia has been also documented (Hidalgo-Lozano et al., 2010, Paul et al., 2012). Both peripheral (Alburquerque-Sendín et al., 2013) and central (Hidalgo-Lozano et al., 2010, Paul et al., 2012) sensitization mechanisms are suggested in playing a role in SAPS.

Peripheral sensitization is mainly caused by endogenous substances related to trauma and inflammation processes that may elicit primary hyperalgesia over the injured area (Curatolo et al., 2006). Central sensitization refers to persistent changes in the central nervous system following prolonged peripheral nociception (Arendt-Nielsen and Graven-Nielsen, 2008). Both peripheral (Alburquerque-Sendín et al., 2013) and central (Hidalgo-Lozano et al., 2010, Paul et al., 2012, Sanchis et al., 2015) sensitizations have already been identified in individuals with SAPS. It is suggested that both mechanisms can contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic pain (Graven-Nielsen and Arendt-Nielsen, 2010).

A number of studies have proposed the utility of topographical pain sensitivity maps as an exploratory method allowing spatial assessment of sensitization mechanisms in several chronic pain disorders, e.g., lateral epicondylalgia (Ruiz_Ruiz et al., 2011), carpal tunnel syndrome (Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2010b), headaches (Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2008, Cuadrado et al., 2010), migraine (Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2009, Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2010a), shoulder pain (Ge et al., 2008) or work-related musculoskeletal disorders (Binderup et al., 2011). These studies revealed that mechanical sensitivity depicted by assessing pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) is not uniformly distributed around the same muscle (Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2008, Ge et al., 2008) or around an anatomical area, e.g., the elbow (Ruiz_Ruiz et al., 2011), the hand (Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., 2010b) or the head (Cuadrado et al., 2010). Furthermore, increased mechanical sensitivity can also occur on the non-affected side as a sign of central sensitization (Ge et al., 2008). Although bilateral hyperalgesia has already been identified in unilateral shoulder pain (Hidalgo-Lozano et al., 2010, Paul et al., 2012, Coronado et al., 2014; Sanchis et al., 2015), results are still conflicting which increases the interest of research in this area.

To the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has used topographical pain maps to investigate mechanical sensitivity around the shoulder girdle in individuals with SAPS. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether differences for topographical pain sensitivity maps of the shoulder area are evident between patients with unilateral SAPS and healthy people. We hypothesized the presence of heterogeneous topographical pressure pain sensitivity maps of the shoulder area and the presence of regional shoulder pain hyperalgesia in subjects with SAPS compared with controls highlighting different levels of mechanical sensitivity on the shoulder in this patient population.

Section snippets

Participants

Posters announcing the objectives of the research were put up all around the university and at public places in the community to recruit the symptomatic subjects.

To be included, patients had to fulfill the following inclusion criteria: a) pain in the C5 or C6 dermatome region (McClure et al., 2006); b) at least one positive test: Neer test (Neer, 1972), Hawkins test (Hawkins and Kennedy, 1980), Jobe test (Jobe and Moynes, 1982) as reported in previous studies related to SAPS (Hegedus et al.,

Demographic and clinical data of the participants

Thirty patients with unilateral SAPS and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls participated in the study. Seventeen patients (57%) had symptoms on the right side and the remaining thirteen (43%) on the left side. Patients showed higher levels of depression, disability and pain as compared to controls (P < 0.05). Table 1 summarizes demographic and clinical features of both groups.

Intra-rater reliability, SEM and MDC

Intra-rater reliability ranged from good to excellent for both groups (symptomatic side, ICC: 0.76–0.95;

Discussion

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that has used topographical pressure pain maps to investigate mechanical pain sensitivity around the shoulder girdle in a SAPS population. Surprisingly, we did not find differences in PPT between patients and controls. PPT assessment is a reliable tool in individuals with SAPS as we found excellent intra-rater reliability with narrow 95%CI values. Nevertheless, maps revealed heterogeneous distribution of pressure pain sensitivity

Conclusion

This study revealed no significant differences for mechanical pain sensitivity when comparing individuals with SAPS to matched healthy controls However, heterogeneous distribution of pressure sensitivity on the shoulder was observed. Further, women were characterized by higher mechanical sensitivity than men. Topographical sensitivity maps reveal spatial information about which sites are most affected in different pain conditions. Current results would not support the presence of central

Funding sources

This study was financially supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) (1086585) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, process number 2012/18368-1).

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Federal University of São Carlos (protocol number 162.245).

Financial disclosure and conflict of interest

We affirm that we have no financial affiliation (including research funding) or involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct financial interest in any info included in this manuscript, except as disclosed in an attachment and cited in the text.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dr Mariana Arias Ávila for the help in the conception of the study; and the volunteers who took part in this study.

References (60)

  • L. Vanderweeën et al.

    Pressure algometry in manual therapy

    Man Ther

    (1996)
  • F. Alburquerque-Sendín et al.

    Bilateral miofascial trigger points and pressure pain thresholds in the shoulder muscles in patients with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome: a blinded, controlled study

    Clin J Pain

    (2013)
  • D.G. Altman et al.

    The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration

    Ann Intern Med

    (2001)
  • L. Arendt-Nielsen et al.

    Muscle pain: sensory implications and interaction with motor control

    Clin J Pain

    (2008)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1988)
  • H. Beckerman et al.

    Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness

    Qual Life Res

    (2001)
  • A.T. Binderup et al.

    Pressure pain threshold mapping - a new imaging modality of muscle sensitivity to pain

    (2008)
  • A.T. Binderup et al.

    Cluster analysis of pressure pain threshold maps from the trapezius muscle

    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin

    (2010)
  • A.T. Binderup et al.

    Pressure pain sensitivity maps, self-reported musculoskeletal disorders and sickness absence among cleaners

    Int Arch Occup Environ Health

    (2011)
  • P.R. Camargo et al.

    Pain in workers with shoulder impingement syndrome: an assessment using the DASH and McGill pain questionnaires

    Braz J Phys Ther

    (2007)
  • P.R. Camargo et al.

    Bilateral deficits in muscle contraction parameters during shoulder scaption in patients with unilateral subacromial impingement syndrome

    Isokinet Exerc Sci

    (2008)
  • P.R. Camargo et al.

    Effects of strengthening and stretching exercises applied during working hours on pain and physical impairment in workers with subacromial impingement syndrome

    Physiother Theory Pract

    (2009)
  • L.S. Chesterton et al.

    Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters

    Clin J Pain

    (2007)
  • R.A. Coronado et al.

    Thermal and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with unilateral shoulder pain: comparison of involved and uninvolved sides

    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

    (2011)
  • R.A. Coronado et al.

    Experimental pain responses support peripheral and central sensitization in patients with unilateral shoulder pain

    Clin J Pain

    (2014)
  • M.L. Cuadrado et al.

    Pressure pain sensitivity of the scalp in patients with nummular headache: a cartographic study

    Cephalalgia

    (2010)
  • R. Diercks et al.

    Dutch Orthopaedic Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain síndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association

    Acta Orthop

    (2014)
  • R. Eston et al.

    Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data. Anthropometry

    (2009)
  • C. Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al.

    Bilateral pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle in chronic tension-type headache

    Headache

    (2008)
  • C. Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al.

    Pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle revealed bilateral pressure hyperalgesia in patients with strictly unilateral migraine

    Cephalalgia

    (2009)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Pressure pain threshold mappings of the infraspinatus muscle in chronic unilateral shoulder pain patients do not reflect generalized hypersensitivity

      2022, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nonetheless, it is important to note that the assessment tool used in this study (PPT) would not by itself allow to discriminate between peripheral and central mechanisms involved in chronic USP at the symptomatic side. Few studies have assessed the sensitivity maps in the shoulder region (Ribeiro et al., 2016; Ge et al., 2008). One of these performed a bilateral assessment of PPT over 10 subareas of the infraspinatus muscles subjects with shoulder pain (Ge et al., 2008), showing that the mid-fiber region of the muscle was the most sensitive in both sides.

    • Absolute and Relative Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold Assessments in the Shoulder Muscles of Participants With and Without Unilateral Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

      2020, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Knowing relative and absolute reliability and how PPTs are present in different muscles will help the clinical management of SIS and contribute to understanding the peripheral4 and central sensitization9,20 process of the symptomatic participants. However, there is little information on the reliability of PPTs in upper limb muscles.6,12,13,21-24 The aim of the present study was to determine intraday intra- and interrater and interday intrarater reliability of PPT assessment in shoulder muscles, examining participants with symptoms of unilateral SIS and others asymptomatic for shoulder pain, and presenting error variance and MDC in the PPT of these assessments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text