Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 57, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 226-232
Metabolism

Participation in road cycling vs running is associated with lower bone mineral density in men

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2007.09.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of regular non–weight-bearing (NWB) exercise on bone health are largely unknown. The objective of the study was to determine the effects of participation in NWB sports on bone health in adult male recreational athletes. Male cyclists (NWB; n = 27) and runners (weight-bearing [WB]; n = 16) aged 20 to 59 years were recruited from the community. Whole-body and regional bone mineral content and bone mineral density (BMD), and body composition were assessed using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Bone formation and resorption markers, and hormones were measured in serum. Bone-loading history was estimated from a sports participation history questionnaire. Nutrient intake and current physical activity were estimated from 7-day written logs. The NWB athletes had significantly lower BMD of the whole body and spine than the WB athletes, despite having similar age, weight, body mass index, body composition, hormonal status, current activity level, and nutrient intakes. Sixty-three percent of NWB athletes had osteopenia of the spine or hip, compared with 19% of WB athletes. Cyclists were 7 times more likely to have osteopenia of the spine than runners, controlling for age, body weight, and bone-loading history. There were no group differences in serum markers of bone turnover. Based on the results of this study, current bone loading is an important determinant of whole-body and lumbar spine BMD. Therefore, bone-loading activity should be sustained during adulthood to maintain bone mass.

Introduction

Osteoporosis affects more than 2 million men in the United States, and nearly 12 million more have osteopenia [1]. In addition, 85% to 90% of all hip and vertebral fractures in men occur in osteoporotic individuals. Furthermore, the number of fractures associated with osteopenia is nearly double that of osteoporotic fractures [2]. Nevertheless, osteopenia and osteoporosis in men often remain undiagnosed and inadequately treated. Unlike women who are often identified as osteopenic or osteoporotic via routine dual x-ray absorptiometry scans, men usually present with fragility fractures, back pain, or diminishing stature [3]. In addition, even after having a fracture, men are less likely to receive follow-up care and to be prescribed antiresorptive pharmacotherapy than women [4].

Risk factors for osteoporosis in men are similar to those identified in women: family history, age, low body weight, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, inadequate calcium or vitamin D intake, low reproductive hormone levels, physical inactivity, and disease or medication affecting bone metabolism [5], [6]. One might expect that men who participate in endurance sports, such as running and road cycling, would be at reduced risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis because of their healthful lifestyle and high levels of physical activity [7], [8]. Surprisingly, the prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis are alarmingly high in adult male road cyclists [9], [10], [11], [12], but not in distance runners [11].

Low body weight and weight loss have been associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) [13], [14] due to reduced mechanical loading on the skeleton and hormonal changes associated with inadequate energy intake [15], [16]. However, because runners and cyclists both have relatively low body weight compared with sedentary men [11], the discrepant BMD has been attributed to lack of ground reaction forces (GRF) on the skeleton during cycling [9], [11], [12].

The importance of mechanical stress in maintaining the balance between bone formation and resorption is evident in the rapid loss of bone that occurs during weightlessness and prolonged bed rest [17], [18]. Road cycling has little osteogenic effect on bone because of the type of forces it exerts on the skeleton [18]. Based on longitudinal studies of bed rest [19], [20] and space flight [20], one might expect bone resorption to be elevated in cyclists, at least transiently, and bone formation to be unchanged. However, the effects of cycling on rates of bone formation and resorption and, therefore, on the remodeling imbalance that leads to bone loss in cyclists remain to be identified. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) determine the effects of participation in non–weight-bearing (NWB) vs weight-bearing (WB) sports on bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD of the whole body, hip, spine, and appendicular skeleton and (2) compare rates of bone turnover between male athletes in NWB (cycling) and WB (running) sports.

Section snippets

Experimental subjects

The effects of participation in a WB vs NWB sport on BMC and BMD and on serum markers of bone turnover in adult male athletes were compared using a cross-sectional study design.

Forty-three male athletes in WB (running, n = 16) and NWB sports (cycling, n = 27) aged 20 to 59 years were recruited from the University of Missouri and Columbia community via flyers posted on campus, at local bicycle and sporting goods stores, and on Web sites of local cycling and running clubs. To be eligible for the

Results

The WB and NWB athletes were, on average, the same age, height, weight, BMI, and body composition (Table 1). The age ranges for the cyclists (20-57 years) and runners (23-59 years) also were comparable. In addition, the WB and NWB groups had equivalent physical activity levels when quantified as hours per week or as daily energy expenditure during training (Table 1). By design, the groups differed in their current bone-loading scores (Table 2). Lifetime cumulative bone-loading exposure and

Discussion

The results of the present study are consistent with earlier studies documenting increased prevalence of osteopenia in adult male road cyclists [9], [10], [11], [12]. By evaluating bone-loading history, we were able to control for the effects of prior activity on current BMD. We found that the cyclists had lower BMD compared with the runners, independent of lifetime cumulative bone loading and of bone loading during adolescence and young adulthood.

References (43)

  • M. Lorentzon et al.

    Age of attainment of peak bone mass is site specific in Swedish men—the GOOD study

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2005)
  • K. Michaelsson et al.

    Leisure physical activity and the risk of fracture in men

    PLoS Med

    (2007)
  • J.F. Nichols et al.

    Low bone mineral density in highly trained male master cyclists

    Osteoporos Int

    (2003)
  • D. Sabo et al.

    Bone quality in the lumbar spine in high-performance athletes

    Eur Spine J

    (1996)
  • A.D. Stewart et al.

    Total and regional bone density in male runners, cyclists, and controls

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2000)
  • S. Prouteau et al.

    Bone density in elite judoists and effects of weight cycling on bone metabolic balance

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2006)
  • S. Prouteau et al.

    Relationships between serum leptin and bone markers during stable weight, weight reduction and weight regain in male and female judoists

    Eur J Endocrinol

    (2006)
  • C.L. Zanker et al.

    Responses of bone turnover markers to repeated endurance running in humans under conditions of energy balance or energy restriction

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2000)
  • R. Ihle et al.

    Dose-response relationships between energy availability and bone turnover in young exercising women

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2004)
  • D.D. Bikle et al.

    The response of bone to unloading

    J Bone Miner Metab

    (1999)
  • M.I. Woodward et al.

    Skeletal accelerations measured during different exercises

    Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]

    (1993)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Site-Specific Bone Differences and Energy Status in Male Competitive Runners and Road Cyclists

      2022, Journal of Clinical Densitometry
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found that runners had greater hip aBMD and total body and hip Z-scores than cyclists, but the lack of differences at the spine were unexpected. Previous studies reported that runners had significantly greater total body and lumbar spine aBMD than cyclists after adjusting for body weight or matching age, gender, and BMI (8,12,17). In addition, Rector et al (17) found that male cyclists were 7.4 times more likely to have osteopenia (based on T-scores) at the spine than male runners after adjusting for age, body weight, and bone loading history.

    • Bone mineral density in male weight-classified athletes is higher than that in male endurance-athletes and non-athletes

      2020, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous studies have reported the BMD reference for swimmers (1.167 g/cm2) and triathletes (1.153 g/cm2), who participate in sports with less bone mechanical stimuli than combat sports, which are lower compared to athletes participating in sports with more physical contact such as basketball (1.299 g/cm2) and handball (1.364 g/cm2) [18]. Another epidemiological study reported that BMD is higher in runners compared to cyclists [19] and this result may account for significantly higher femoral BMD in recreational male runners [20]. Participants in endurance sports in this study comprised triathletes (1.188 ± 0.083 g/cm2), two cyclists (1.116 and 1.069 g/cm2), and one orienteer (1.207 g/cm2) in this study.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text