Elsevier

Physiotherapy

Volume 100, Issue 1, March 2014, Pages 1-8
Physiotherapy

Systematic review
Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM) is common during and after pregnancy, and has been related to lumbopelvic instability and pelvic floor weakness. Women with DRAM are commonly referred to physiotherapists for conservative management, but little is known about the effectiveness of such strategies.

Objectives

To determine if non-surgical interventions (such as exercise) prevent or reduce DRAM.

Data sources

EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, PUBMED, AMED and PEDro were searched.

Study selection/eligibility

Studies of all designs that included any non-surgical interventions to manage DRAM during the ante- and postnatal periods were included.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) where appropriate.

Results

Eight studies totalling 336 women during the ante- and/or postnatal period were included. The study design ranged from case study to randomised controlled trial. All interventions included some form of exercise, mainly targeted abdominal/core strengthening. The available evidence showed that exercise during the antenatal period reduced the presence of DRAM by 35% (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92), and suggested that DRAM width may be reduced by exercising during the ante- and postnatal periods.

Limitations

The papers reviewed were of poor quality as there is very little high-quality literature on the subject.

Conclusion and implications

Based on the available evidence and quality of this evidence, non-specific exercise may or may not help to prevent or reduce DRAM during the ante- and postnatal periods.

Introduction

During and after pregnancy, many women experience an increase in the inter-recti abdominal muscle distance due to stretching and thinning of the linea alba [1]. A widening of >2.7 cm at the level of the umbilicus is considered a pathological diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM) [2]. Other studies have defined DRAM as an inter-recti distance of >2 cm at one or more assessment points (at the level of the umbilicus or 4.5 cm above or below the umbilicus) [3], [4]. DRAM occurs due to hormonal elastic changes of the connective tissue, mechanical stresses placed on the abdominal wall by the growing fetus, and displacement of the abdominal organs [4], [5], [6], [7]. DRAM usually appears in the second trimester of pregnancy and is found most frequently in the third trimester [6]. Studies have demonstrated that the inter-recti distance increases at approximately 14 weeks of gestation and continues to increase until delivery [7]. Natural resolution and greatest recovery of DRAM occurs between 1 day and 8 weeks after delivery, after which time recovery plateaus [8].

DRAM is relatively common and can have negative health consequences for women during and after pregnancy (ante- and postnatal periods). Varying estimates of incidence of DRAM have been reported ranging from 66% to 100% during the third trimester of pregnancy [6], [9], and up to 53% immediately after delivery [10]. The abdominal wall has important functions in posture, trunk and pelvic stability, respiration, trunk movement and support of the abdominal viscera. An increase in the inter-recti distance puts these functions in jeopardy [11], [12], [13], and can weaken abdominal muscles and influence their functions [14], [15]. This may result in altered trunk mechanics, impaired pelvic stability and changed posture, which leave the lumbar spine and pelvis more vulnerable to injury [4], [7], [13].

Despite DRAM being a common and significant clinical problem, little is known about its prevention or management. Risk factors such as multiparity, maternal age and childcare responsibilities have been associated with DRAM. There is conflicting evidence linking DRAM with weight gain and higher body mass index [4], [10], [16]. Surgical correction of DRAM has been demonstrated to reduce some of the effects of a wide diastasis such as back pain [17]. Anecdotally, regular exercise prior to pregnancy and during the antenatal period seems to reduce the risk of developing DRAM and reduce the size of DRAM, respectively [6]. Abdominal exercises are also frequently prescribed to postnatal women who have DRAM. Other regularly used non-surgical interventions in women with DRAM include postural and back care education, external support (e.g. tubigrip or corset) and aerobic exercises [18], [19], [20], [21]. However, it is unclear what types of non-surgical interventions, including exercise, are effective to prevent and/or reduce DRAM.

Therefore, the aims of this review were to determine whether non-surgical interventions can prevent or reduce DRAM in the antenatal period, and reduce DRAM and health-related negative effects of DRAM in the postnatal period.

Section snippets

Methods

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42012002944).

Flow of studies through the review

The search strategy yielded 1382 potentially relevant studies. Selection on title and abstract excluded 1362 studies, and the full text of 20 articles was reviewed (Fig. 1). A further 12 potential studies were excluded based on the full-text evaluation due to no intervention being investigated (n = 7), no DRAM outcomes reported (n = 4), and the type of publication (n = 1). A manual search of the reference lists of included studies did not result in more eligible studies. Consensus was reached to

Discussion

This systematic review analysed eight studies of varying designs evaluating interventions to prevent and/or reduce DRAM. All studies presented some form of exercise as an intervention alone or in combination with education and/or external support garments. Due to the low number and quality of included articles, there is insufficient evidence to recommend that exercise may help to prevent or reduce DRAM.

Although all studies showed that exercise was protective for the development and/or reduction

Conclusion

Due to the poor quality of the current literature, current evidence suggests that non-specific exercise may or may not help to prevent or reduce DRAM during the ante- and postnatal periods.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Nick Taylor for his guidance around the development of the review protocol and suggestions on a draft manuscript.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References (34)

  • J.S. Boissonnault et al.

    Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year

    Phys Ther

    (1988)
  • W. Gilleard et al.

    Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period

    Phys Ther

    (1996)
  • R. Hanneford et al.

    An investigation of the incidence, degree and possible predisposing factors of the rectus diastasis in the immediate post-partum period

    J Nat Obstet Gynaecol Special Group Aust Physiother Assoc

    (1985)
  • G. Candido et al.

    Risk factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis

    J Assoc Chart Physiother Womens Health

    (2005)
  • S.G. Bursch

    Interrater reliability of diastasis recti abdominis measurement

    Phys Ther

    (1987)
  • C.A. Richardson et al.

    Backpain and lumbopelvic stabilisation: the case for the local muscle system

  • A. Fast et al.

    Low-back pain in pregnancy. Abdominal muscles, sit-up performance, and back pain

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    Systematic review registration no: PROSPERO CRD42012002944.

    View full text