Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Accuracy of a combined heart rate and motion sensor for assessing energy expenditure in free-living adults during a double-blind crossover caffeine trial using doubly labeled water as the reference method

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

A combined heart rate (HR) and motion sensor (Actiheart) has been proposed as an accurate method for assessing total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE). However, the extent to which factors such as caffeine may affect the accuracy by which the estimated HR-related PAEE contribution will affect TEE and PAEE estimates is unknown. Therefore, we examined the validity of Actiheart in estimating TEE and PAEE in free-living adults under a caffeine trial compared with doubly labeled water (DLW) as reference criterion.

Subjects/Methods:

Using a double-blind crossover trial (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: #NCT01477294) with two conditions (4-day each with a 3-day-washout period), randomly ordered as caffeine (5 mg/kg per day) and placebo (malt-dextrine) intake, TEE was measured by DLW in 17 physically active men (20–38 years) who were non-caffeine users. In each condition, resting energy expenditure (REE) was assessed by indirect calorimetry and PAEE was calculated as (TEE−(REE+0.1 TEE)). Simultaneously, PAEE and TEE were estimated by Actiheart using an individual calibration (ACC+HRstep).

Results:

Under caffeine, ACC+HRstep explained 76 and 64% of TEE and PAEE from DLW, respectively; corresponding results for the placebo condition were 82 and 66%. No mean bias was found between ACC+HRstep and DLW for TEE (caffeine:-468 kJ per day; placebo:-407 kJ per day), although PAEE was slightly underestimated (caffeine:-856 kJ per day; placebo:-1147 kJ per day). Similar limits of agreement were observed in both conditions ranging from −2066 to 3002 and from −3488 to 1776 kJ per day for TEE and PAEE, respectively.

Conclusions:

Regardless of caffeine intake, the combined HR and motion sensor is valid for estimating free-living energy expenditure in a group of healthy men but is less accurate for an individual assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manini TM, Everhart JE, Patel KV, Schoeller DA, Colbert LH, Visser M et al. Daily activity energy expenditure and mortality among older adults. JAMA 2006; 296: 171–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Padilla J, Wallace JP, Park S . Accumulation of physical activity reduces blood pressure in pre- and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1264–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santos DA, Silva AM, Baptista F, Santos R, Gobbo LA, Mota J et al. Are cardiorespiratory fitness and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity independently associated to overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity in elderly? Am J Hum Biol 2012; 24: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine JA, Lanningham-Foster LM, McCrady SK, Krizan AC, Olson LR, Kane PH et al. Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity. Science 2005; 307: 584–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong L, Block G, Mandel S . Activities contributing to total energy expenditure in the United States: results from the NHAPS study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004; 1: 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamonte MJ, Ainsworth BE . Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: S370–S378. discussion S419–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoeller DA . Recent advances from application of doubly labeled water to measurement of human energy expenditure. J Nutr 1999; 129: 1765–1768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA . Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S471–S480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wong MY, Andersen LB et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96: 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Villars C, Bergouignan A, Dugas J, Antoun E, Schoeller DA, Roth H et al. Validity of combining heart rate and uniaxial acceleration to measure free-living physical activity energy expenditure in young men. J Appl Physiol 2012; 113: 1763–1771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, Swartz AM, Thompson DL . Simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique to estimate energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 2118–2123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rennie K, Rowsell T, Jebb SA, Holburn D, Wareham NJ . A combined heart rate and movement sensor: proof of concept and preliminary testing study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 409–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ . Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 561–570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Assah FK, Ekelund U, Brage S, Wright A, Mbanya JC, Wareham NJ . Accuracy and validity of a combined heart rate and motion sensor for the measurement of free-living physical activity energy expenditure in adults in Cameroon. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40: 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benowitz NL, Jacob P 3rd, Mayan H, Denaro C . Sympathomimetic effects of paraxanthine and caffeine in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 58: 684–691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. Steps to Health. A European Framework to Promote Physical Activity for Health. In., World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark, 32–34 2007.

  18. Currie SR, Wilson KG, Gauthier ST . Caffeine and chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 1995; 11: 214–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heckman MA, Weil J, Gonzalez de Mejia E . Caffeine (1, 3, 7-trimethylxanthine) in foods: a comprehensive review on consumption, functionality, safety, and regulatory matters. J Food Sci 2010; 75: R77–R87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burke LM . Caffeine and sports performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2008; 33: 1319–1334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 2009; 107: 403–405.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bird ET, Parker BD, Kim HS, Coffield KS . Caffeine ingestion and lower urinary tract symptoms in healthy volunteers. Neurourol Urodyn 2005; 24: 611–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R . Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Publishers: Champaign, IL, USA 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Santos DA, Gobbo LA, Matias CN, Petroski EL, Goncalves EM, Cyrino ES et al. Body composition in taller individuals using DXA: a validation study for athletic and non-athletic populations. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L . Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 881–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weir JB . New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949; 109: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Silva AM, Santos DA, Matias CN, Minderico CS, Schoeller DA, Sardinha LB . Total energy expenditure assessment in elite junior basketball players: a validation study using doubly labeled water. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1920–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schoeller DA, van Santen E . Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method. J Appl Physiol 1982; 53: 955–959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin CK, Correa JB, Han H, Allen HR, Rood JC, Champagne CM et al. Validity of the remote food photography method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012; 20: 891–899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brage S, Ekelund U, Brage N, Hennings MA, Froberg K, Franks PW et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103: 682–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schofield WN . Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39 (Suppl 1): 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lin LI . A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts AT, de Jonge-Levitan L, Parker CC, Greenway F . The effect of an herbal supplement containing black tea and caffeine on metabolic parameters in humans. Altern Med Rev 2005; 10: 321–325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper JA, Watras AC, O'Brien MJ, Luke A, Dobratz JR, Earthman CP et al. Assessing validity and reliability of resting metabolic rate in six gas analysis systems. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 128–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW, Andersen LB, Froberg K . Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1447–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Spierer DK, Hagins M, Rundle A, Pappas E . A comparison of energy expenditure estimates from the Actiheart and Actical physical activity monitors during low intensity activities, walking, and jogging. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 659–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Crouter SE, Bassett DR Jr . A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 217–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Bassett DR Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE . Evaluation of heart rate as a method for assessing moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S465–S470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li R, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JG . A critical evaluation of heart rate monitoring to assess energy expenditure in individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 602–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for their time and effort. This work was supported by the Portuguese Institute of Hydration and Health and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A M Silva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, A., Santos, D., Matias, C. et al. Accuracy of a combined heart rate and motion sensor for assessing energy expenditure in free-living adults during a double-blind crossover caffeine trial using doubly labeled water as the reference method. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 20–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.51

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.51

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links