Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical Activity for the Chronically Ill and Disabled

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exercise prescription principles for persons without chronic disease and/or disability are based on well developed scientific information. While there are varied objectives for being physically active, including enhancing physical fitness, promoting health by reducing the risk for chronic disease and ensuring safety during exercise participation, the essence of the exercise prescription is based on individual interests, health needs and clinical status, and therefore the aforementioned goals do not always carry equal weight. In the same manner, the principles of exercise prescription for persons with chronic disease and/or disability should place more emphasis on the patient’s clinical status and, as a result, the exercise mode, intensity, frequency and duration are usually modified according to their clinical condition. Presently, these exercise prescription principles have been scientifically defined for clients with coronary heart disease. However, other diseases and/or disabilities have been studied less (e.g. renal failure, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, cerebral palsy). This article reviews these issues with specific reference to persons with chronic diseases and disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I.
Table II.
Table III.
Fig. 1.
Table IV.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Table V.
Fig. 4.
Table VI.
Table VII.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health and Human Services. Research plan for the national center for medical rehabilitation research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993. NIH publication no. 93-3509

    Google Scholar 

  3. Evans EP, Tew B. The energy expenditure of spina bifida children during walking and wheelchair ambulation. Z Kinderchir 1981; 34: 425–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman MD, Sheldahl LM, Buley KJ, et al. Physiological comparison of walking among bilateral above-knee amputee and able-bodied subjects, and a model to account for the differences in metabolic cost. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 385–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nowroozi F, Salvanelli ML, Gerber LH. Energy expenditure in hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 300–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose J, Gamble JG, Burgos A, et al. Energy expenditure index of walking for normal children and for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990; 32: 333–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose J, Gamble JG, Medeiros J, et al. Energy cost of walking in normal children and in those with cerebral palsy: comparison of heart rate and oxygen uptake. J Pediatr Orthop 1989; 9: 276–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein RB, Belanger M, Wheeler G, et al. Electrical systems for improving locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury: an assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 954–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Unnithan VB, Drowling JJ, Frost G, et al. Role of cocontraction in the 02 cost of walking in children with cerebral palsy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 1498–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barth DG, Schumacher L, Sienko SS. Gait analysis and energy cost of below-knee amputees wearing six different prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthotics 1989; 4: 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, et al. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 583–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krawetz P, Nance P. Gait analysis of spinal cord injured subjects: effects of injury level and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 635–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lechner DF, McCarthy C, Holden MK. Gait deviations in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 1335–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olney SJ, MacPhail H, Hedden DM, et al. Work and power in hemiplegic cerebral palsy gait. Phys Ther 1990; 70: 431–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Skrotzky K. Gait analysis in cerebral palsied and nonhandicapped children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 291–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bar-Or O. Exercise in childhood. In: Walsh RP, Shephard RJ, editors. Current therapy in sports medicine. Toronto: CV Mosby, 1985: 1985–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson R, Davis G. The value of sports and recreation for the physically disabled. Orthop Clin North Am 1983; 14: 301–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Santiago MC, Coyle CP, Kinney WB. Aerobic exercise effect on individuals with physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 1192–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ades PA, Hanson JS, Gunther PG, et al. Exercise conditioning in the elderly coronary patient. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 121–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ades PA, Grunvald MH. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after conditioning in older coronary patients. Am Heart J 1990; 120: 585–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ades PA, Waldmann ML, Gillespie C. A controlled trial of exercise training in older coronary patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50A: M7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. King AC, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, et al. Group vs. home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women. JAMA 1991; 266: 1535–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1982; 19 (3): 276–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Franklin BA, Gordon S, Timmis GC. Amount of exercise necessary for the patient with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1426–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Convertino VA. Effect of orthostatic stress on exercise performance after bed rest: relation to in hospital rehabilitation. J Cardiac Rehabil 1983; 3: 660–3

    Google Scholar 

  27. DeBusk RF, Stenestrand U, Sheehan M, et al. Training effects of long versus short bouts of exercise in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 1010–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Franklin BA. Aerobic exercise training programs for the upper body. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: S141–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Franklin BA, Vander L, Wrisley D, et al. Training ability of arms versus legs in men with previous myocardial infarction. Chest 1994; 105: 262–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Franklin BA. Motivating patients to exercise: strategies to increase compliance. Sports Med Digest 1994; 16: 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s exercise management for persons with chronic disease and disabilities. 1st ed. In: Durstine JL, Bloomquist LE, Figoni SF, et al., editors. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  32. Burgess EM, Rappoport A. Physical fitness: a guide for individuals with limb loss. Baltimore (MD): Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  33. Painter P, Blagg C, Moore GE. Exercise for the dialysis patient: a comprehensive program. Madison (WI): Medical Education Institute, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kenney WL, Humphrey RH, Bryant CX, et al., editors. American College of Sports Medicine’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roitman JL, Kelsey M, LaFontaine TP, et al., editors. American College of Sports Medicine’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cooper RA, Quatrano LA, Axelson PW, et al. Research on physical activity and health among people with disabilities: a consensus statement. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 142–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Painter P. The importance of exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with end stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24 (1 Suppl. 1): S2–S9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Larry Durstine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durstine, J.L., Painter, P., Franklin, B.A. et al. Physical Activity for the Chronically Ill and Disabled. Sports Med 30, 207–219 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030030-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030030-00005

Keywords

Navigation