Skip to main content
Log in

The Central Governor Model of Exercise Regulation Applied to the Marathon

  • Conference Paper
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two popular models hold that performance during exercise is limited by chemical factors acting either in the exercising muscles or in the brain producing either ‘peripheral’ or ‘central’ fatigue, respectively. A common feature of both models is that neither allows humans to ‘anticipate’ what will happen in the future and modify their exercise response accordingly. The peripheral fatigue model predicts that exercise terminates only after there has been catastrophic failure in one or more body systems and only when all the available motor units in the active muscles have been activated. The marathon race provides evidence that human athletes race ‘in anticipation’ by setting a variable pace at the start, dependent in part on the environmental conditions and the expected difficulty of the course, with the capacity to increase that pace near the finish. Marathoners also finish such races without evidence for a catastrophic failure of homeostasis characterised by the development of a state of absolute fatigue in which all the available motor units in their active muscles are recruited. These findings are best explained by the action of a central (brain) neural control that regulates performance in the marathon ‘in anticipation’ specifically to prevent biological harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitts RH. Cellular mechanisms of muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 1994; 74 (1): 49–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Noakes TD. Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or enhance athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000; 10 (3): 123–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon WB. The wisdom of the body. Revised edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1939

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 2001; 81 (4): 1725–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dishman RK, Berthoud HR, Booth FW, et al. Neurobiology of exercise. obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14 (3): 345–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A. Logical limmtions to the “catastrophe” models of fatigue during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38 (5): 648–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38 (6): 797–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baldwin J, Snow RJ, Gibala MJ, et al. Glycogen availability does not affectthe TCA cycle or TAN pools during prolonged, fatiguing exercise. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94 (6): 2181–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noakes TD. Linear relationship between theperception ofeffort and the duration of constant load exercise that remains. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96 (4): 1571–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans. Summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (2): 120–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert EV, St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Complex systems model of fatigue: integrative homoeostafic control of peripheral physiological systems during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (1): 52–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tucker R, Male T, Lambert EV, et al. The rate of heat storage mediates an anticipatory reduction in exercise intensity during cycling at a fixed rating of perceived exertion. J Physiol 2006; 574 (Pt 3): 905–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Williamson JW, Faded PJ, Mitchell JH. New insights into central cardiovascular control during exercise in humans: a central command update. Exp Physiol 2006; 91 (1): 51–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfitzmger P, Douglas PS. Advanced marathoning. Champaign (IL): Human Emotes, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker R, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. An analysis of pacing strategies during men’s world record performances in track athletics. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 2006; 1: 233–45

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gladden LB. Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. J Physiol 2004; 558 (Pt 1): 5–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author’s research, on which this review is based, is funded by the Medical Research Council of South Africa, the Harry Crossley and Nellie Atkinson Staff Research Funds of the University of Cape Town, Discovery Health and the National Research Foundation of South Africa through its THRIP initiative. Timothy D. Noakes is a contracted researcher for Bromar Foods Pty Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Noakes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noakes, T.D. The Central Governor Model of Exercise Regulation Applied to the Marathon. Sports Med 37, 374–377 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737040-00026

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737040-00026

Keywords

Navigation