Preventive care in managed care and fee-for-service plans: is it cost effective?

Manag Care Interface. 2003 Feb;16(2):47-50.

Abstract

Lack of coverage, knowledge, and physician guidance, and low socioeconomic status are major barriers to receiving preventive care. Compared with fee-for-service insurance, managed care promotes prevention through more generous coverage, physician incentives, and patient education, and members of MCOs use more preventive services than do members of fee-for-service plans. However, cost effectiveness of prevention has not been previously examined. A study of seven preventive services suggests that managed care enrollees more frequently obtained four preventive services, including two less-effective ones. For less-effective services, it may be prudent to base disease-risk assessment on key factors other than age and sex, and screen only patients at high risk. Effective screening strategies must be identified, especially for the underserved, low-income population.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Fee-for-Service Plans / economics*
  • Female
  • Health Promotion
  • Health Services Research
  • Humans
  • Insurance Selection Bias
  • Male
  • Managed Care Programs / economics*
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care*
  • Physical Examination / statistics & numerical data
  • Poverty
  • Preventive Health Services / economics*
  • Preventive Health Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Risk Assessment
  • United States