A clinical evaluation of flurbiprofen LAT and piroxicam gel: a multicentre study in general practice

Clin Rheumatol. 1996 May;15(3):243-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02229701.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, multicentre, open, crossover study of the comparative efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of two topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapies, flurbiprofen local-action transcutaneous (LAT) patch (40 mg b.d.) and piroxicam gel (3 cm, 0.5% q.d.s), was conducted in general practice in the UK in 137 men and women with soft-tissue rheumatism of the shoulder or elbow (e.g. epicondylitis, tendinitis, bursitis and adhesive capsulitis). Patients received one therapy for 4 days before crossing over to the other NSAID for a further 4 days, followed by 6 days of their preferred therapy. Clinical assessment of severity of pain, tenderness and overall clinical condition was carried out at baseline and after 4, 8 and 14 days. Patients self-assessed the severity of pain during the day and at night, and also the quality of their sleep during each treatment phase. More patients showed a greater improvement in all of the clinical assessments of efficacy following treatment with flurbiprofen LAT during the crossover phase. There was a statistically significant reduction in the severity of pain, the principal measure of efficacy, in favour of flurbiprofen LAT: 42% of patients showed greater improvement with flurbiprofen LAT compared with 26% who showed a greater improvement with piroxicam gel (p = 0.012; n = 131, intent-to-treat). Eligible dataset (n = 126) analysis revealed statistically significant differences in favour of flurbiprofen LAT in the severity of lesion tenderness (p = 0.03) and the overall change in clinical condition (p = 0.04) compared with baseline status. Superior efficacy for flurbiprofen LAT was also indicated in the patients' assessment at the end of the crossover phase (day 8), at which 69% chose to continue treatment with flurbiprofen LAT compared with only 31% of patients who chose piroxicam gel (n = 126; p < 0.001). There were, in addition, statistically significant differences in favour of flurbiprofen LAT in assessments for night pain (p < 0.001), quality of sleep (p = 0.004) and the patients' overall opinion of treatment (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated with a low incidence of mainly local adverse events. These results showed that flurbiprofen LAT had a greater efficacy than piroxicam gel, and was also preferred by patients in the treatment of painful soft-tissue rheumatism of the shoulder and elbow.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Cutaneous
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / adverse effects
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Flurbiprofen / administration & dosage*
  • Flurbiprofen / adverse effects
  • Flurbiprofen / therapeutic use
  • Gels
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Piroxicam / administration & dosage*
  • Piroxicam / adverse effects
  • Piroxicam / therapeutic use
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rheumatic Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Rheumatic Diseases / physiopathology

Substances

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Gels
  • Piroxicam
  • Flurbiprofen