Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

Why does exercise terminate at the maximal lactate steady state intensity?
  1. B Baron1,2,
  2. T D Noakes3,
  3. J Dekerle2,
  4. F Moullan1,
  5. S Robin4,
  6. R Matran4,
  7. P Pelayo2
  1. 1
    Centre Universitaire de Recherches en Activités Physiques et Sportives, Département STAPS, Faculté des Sciences de l’Homme et de l’Environnement, Université de La Réunion, Le Tampon, France
  2. 2
    Laboratoire d’Etudes de la Motricité Humaine, Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l’EP, Université de Lille, Ronchin, France
  3. 3
    MRC/UCT Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Sports Science Institute of South Africa, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  4. 4
    Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, Hôpital Calmette, CHRU Lille, France
  1. Bertrand Baron, Département STAPS, Université de La Réunion, 117 rue du Général Ailleret, 97430 Le Tampon, France; bertrand.baron{at}univ-reunion.fr

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure physiological responses during exercise performed until exhaustion at the exercise intensity corresponding to the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) in order to determine why subjects stopped.

Methods: Eleven male trained subjects performed a test at MLSS on a cycle ergometer until exhaustion.

Results: Time to exhaustion was 55.0 (SD 8.5) min. No variation was observed between the 10th and the last minute for arterial pyruvate, bicarbonate, and haemoglobin concentrations, redox state, arterial oxygen pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, osmolality, haematocrit, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide output, and gas exchange ratio (p>0.05). Arterial lactate concentration and arterial carbon dioxide pressure decreased significantly whereas pH, base excess and the Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) increased significantly (p<0.05). Although respiratory rate, minute ventilation and heart rate increased significantly until exhaustion (p<0.05), values at termination of the MLSS test were significantly lower than values measured during a maximal exercise test (p<0.05). Blood ammonia concentrations rose progressively during the MLSS test. However, there is no known mechanism by which this change could cause peripheral fatigue.

Conclusions: Exercise termination was not associated with evidence of failure in any physiological system during prolonged exercise performed at MLSS. Thus the biological mechanisms of exercise termination at MLSS were compatible with an integrative homoeostatic control of peripheral physiological systems during exercise.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

According to the “catastrophic” model of fatigue,1 fatigue occurs only after bodily system failure has occurred, leading rapidly to exhaustion. Hence, accumulation of metabolites such as lactic acid, or substrate depletion, induces catastrophic failure of homeostasis in the exercising muscles, leading directly to exercise termination.

Recently, Noakes and colleagues proposed a model of integrative central neural regulation of effort.27 They claimed that there is no convincing evidence for failure of any of the major organ systems at exhaustion in healthy athletes. However, this model is not a simple reworking of the old central versus peripheral models. Rather, the authors explain that all physiological systems must be homoeostatically regulated specifically to prevent catastrophic failure, including irreversible widespread cell damage or even death. This model proposes that physical activity is controlled by a central governor in the brain so that the human body functions as a complex system during exercise. They propose that, during self-paced exercise, the central nervous system (CNS) continuously modifies the pace as part of a complex, non-linear dynamic system.8 9 Metabolic rate, the size of the fuel reserves and the rates of heat accumulation, amongst many other physiological variables, would be monitored in order to generate subconscious calculations that create a continuously adjusting power output during exercise.9 Indeed, according to this new model, biological changes in peripheral systems act as afferent signals to modulate control processes in the brain in a dynamic, non-linear, integrative manner. The brain achieves this control by continuously varying the work rate and metabolic demand.3

Thus, on the basis of feedforward control modified by afferent feedback from many physiological systems, the brain continuously alters pacing strategy, with the sensation of fatigue being the conscious interpretation of these homoeostatic, central governor control mechanisms.7 According to this novel explanation, the rising perception of discomfort progressively reduces the conscious desire to override this control mechanism, leading either to reduced exercise intensity or to the termination of exercise if the intensity cannot be reduced. Hence, fatigue is the conscious manifestation of the subconscious CNS processes.10 11

Recently Noakes12 has shown that marathoners finished races without evidence for a catastrophic failure of homoeostasis, confirming the anticipatory mechanism of central neural control in accordance with the central governor model. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no study has verified whether this model could be applied to exercises performed at higher intensities.

Hence, rather than trying to provide evidence for a “grand unified theory of fatigue”, the purpose of our present study was to observe physiological responses and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE)13 during endurance exercise performed until exhaustion to verify whether the central governor model could predict how fatigue develops at the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) intensity that corresponds to the transition between aerobic and “anaerobic metabolism”.14

METHODS

Subjects and design

Eleven well-trained male subjects aged 20 (SD 2) years volunteered for this study. Mean height and body mass values were 1.80 (0.03) m and 73.5 (5.2) kg, respectively. All the subjects performed six tests on a cycle ergometer (Ergo-metrics 800, Ergoline, Germany) in an air-conditioned room (20°C) within a 15 day period as follows.

Methodology

Test 1

An incremental continuous cycling test was performed for the measurement of maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). This maximal incremental test was preceded by a 3 min warm-up period at 75 W. This initial workload was then increased by 25 W/min. To ensure that VO2max was reached during the test, subjects were verbally encouraged to continue as long as possible. The test ended at the point of voluntary exhaustion. During the test, the subjects breathed through a face mask. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE) and respiratory rate (RR) were measured breath by breath using an open circuit system (CPX Medical Graphics, St Paul, Minnesota). The values were averaged for a 15 s period. The mean respiratory exchange ratio (RER) values were calculated from the recorded measurements. VO2max and MAP were defined as the highest VO2 and the highest power output attained at exhaustion. A 10-lead ECG (Quinton Q 810, Seattle, Washington) was continuously recorded during tests to determine heart rate (HR).

Tests 2, 3, 4, 5

Four 30 min tests were randomly performed at power output corresponding to 70, 75, 80 and 85% of the VO2max measured in test 1. Tests were separated by 1 day of total rest and were randomised. These intensities were chosen in order to determine the single intensity corresponding to the MLSS for each subject. Finger-tip whole blood samples were taken every 5 min during each test and were analysed using the photometric method (Dr Lange miniphotometer plus LP20, GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) in order to determine the capillary blood lactate concentration ([La]cap). MLSS was determined for each subject as the highest workload that could be maintained with a [La] increase lower than 1.0 mmol/l during the final 20 min of the appropriate 30 min tests.15 The [La] value at MLSS was calculated as the average [La] measured at the 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th min of the test.

Test 6

All subjects were asked to perform a test until exhaustion at the intensity corresponding to MLSS previously determined. VO2, VCO2, RER, VE, RR, and HR were continuously measured according to the procedures used in test 1. Nevertheless, because of the different times to exhaustion of the 11 subjects, these respiratory parameters and HR were expressed and analysed as percentage of time to exhaustion between 10% and 100% of time to exhaustion (t10%, t20%, t30%, t40%, t50%, t60%, t70%, t80%, t90% and t100%). During these tests, arterial blood was sampled from the radial artery through a catheter in order to determine arterial plasma lactate ([La]) and pyruvate ([Pyr]) concentrations, redox state ([La]/[Pyr]) (KONE LAB 30, Eragny, France), and ammonia concentrations ([NH4]) (Synchron Beckman Coulter LX 20, Paris, France). In the same way, pH, arterial oxygen pressure (pO2), arterial carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SO2), haematocrit (Ht), and haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) were measured, using electrochemical methodology (ABL 520, Radiometer Medical A/S, Bronshoj, Danemark) whereas bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3]) and base excess (BE) were calculated.

All these blood variables were measured at rest (t0), and at the 10th, 20th, 30th min and at exercise termination (t10, t20, t30, and tend). The RPE was measured using Borg’s category ratio scale,13 which consists of 12 statements ranging from 0 to 10 (from “nothing” to “maximal”). Similarly general, muscular and ventilatory perceptions of exertion (genRPE, muscRPE, and ventilRPE, respectively) were measured on the basis of their responses using a modified Borg’s category ratio scale13 presented to the subjects at t10, t20, t30, and tend. Tympanic temperature was measured using an eardrum thermometer (Braun Thermo Scan ear thermometer, Gmbh, Kronberg/TS, Germany) at t0 and tend.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were performed using STATISTICA software (Statsoft 2000). Standard statistical methods were used for the calculation of means and standard deviations. Normal Gaussian distribution of the data was verified by the Shapiro–Wilks’ test. ANOVA with repeated measurements was used to compare the changes in physiological parameters during test 6. All data were compared at t10, t20, t30, and tend, except for heart rate and respiratory parameters, which were analysed minute-by-minute and expressed relative to the percentage of time to exhaustion. Compound symmetry, or sphericity, was verified by the Mauchley test. When the assumption of sphericity was not met, the significance of F ratios was adjusted according to the Greenhouse−Geisser procedure. Multiple comparisons were made with the Tukey HSD post hoc test when the Greenhouse–Geisser epsilon correction factor was >0.50, or with the Bonferroni post hoc test when the epsilon was <0.50. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05 level for all analyses.

RESULTS

Incremental continuous test (Test 1)

Mean maximal aerobic power value reached by the subjects was 323.2 (30.2) W and corresponded to a VO2max of 54.8 8.2 ml/min/kg (table 1). HRmax was 203 (SD 18) beats/min. The maximal values of HR, VO2, VCO2, RER and VE attained during the test (HRmax, VO2max, VCO2max, RERmax, VEmax) are reported in table 1.

Table 1 Age and anthropometric data of the subjects, maximal values of heart rate (HRmax), oxygen uptake (VO2max), carbon dioxide output (VCO2max), respiratory exchange ratio (RERmax), respiratory rate (RRmax) and VEmax attained during the incremental test (Test I)

Submaximal tests (Tests 2, 3, 4, 5)

In each subject, [La]cap increased more than 1 mmol/l between t10 and t30 in at least one of the tests. Mean MLSS intensity was determined using the different submaximal tests corresponding to 71.3% (5.2%) of VO2max. Mean capillary blood lactate concentration value corresponding to MLSS was 5.5 (1.5) mmol/l and ranged from 3.6 to 7.9 mmol/l.

Test at MLSS (Test 6)

Time to exhaustion

Subjects were able to maintain the exercise intensity corresponding to MLSS for 55.0 (SD 8.5) min.

Cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory parameters

All the mean values reported during the test were significantly higher than those measured at rest (p<0.05) (table 2). Mean values of VO2, VCO2 and RER did not vary between t10% and t100% (2.7389 (SD 0.5594) vs 2.8913 (SD 0.3438) l/min, 2.6697 (SD 0.5893) vs 2.7586 (SD 0.3678) l/min and 0.97 (SD 0.04) vs 0.95 (SD 0.05), respectively, p>0.05; table 2) whereas RR and VE increased significantly (28.4 (SD 4.8) vs 47.4 (SD 7.6) cycles/min and 64.3 (SD 17.2) vs 85.4 (SD 14.8) l/min respectively, p <0.05). The Bonferroni post hoc test showed that RR increased after t40%, whereas VE increased between t10% and t60%, t10% and t80%, and t10% and t100%, but did not evolve after t20%. Some of these findings are presented graphically in fig 1.

Figure 1 Respiratory parameters (oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory rate (RR)) during the test performed to exhaustion at MLSS (Test 6). *significant variation (p<0.05) between t10% and t100% of time to exhaustion.
Table 2 Evolution of blood parameters, general rating of perceived exertion (genRPE), muscular rating of perceived exertion (muscRPE) and ventilatory rating of perceived exertion (ventilRPE) during the test performed at MLSS to exhaustion (Test 6)

HR increased between t10% and t100% (151 (SD 19) vs 175 (SD 14) beats/min, p<0.05; fig 2). The Bonferroni post hoc test showed that HR values increased significantly between t10% and t40%, t10% and t60%, t10% and t80%, t10% and t90%, and t10% and t100%. Even though exercise was performed in an air-conditioned environment (20°C), body temperature significantly increased between t0 and tend (37.3 (SD 0.5) vs 38.4 (SD 0.7)°C, p<0.05).

Figure 2 Heart rate (HR) during the test performed to exhaustion at MLSS (test 6). *significant variation (p<0.05) between t10% and t100% of time to exhaustion.

Blood parameters and RPE

Mean values and standard deviations of blood parameters at t0, t10, t20, t30, and tend are presented in table 2. With the exception of pCO2 and pH values, which were significantly lower (p <0.05), all the mean values reported at t10, t20, t30 and tend were significantly higher during exercise than were values measured at rest. No blood parameters varied significantly between t10 and tend except [NH4], BE and pH values, which increased significantly (p <0.05), and [La] and PCO2 values, which decreased significantly (p <0.05). Mean [Pyr] and [La]/[Pyr] values at t10, t20, t30, and tend were 18.56 (SD 3.76) mmol/l and 28.1 (SD 3.7) mmol/l, respectively. Mean pO2, SO2 and [HCO3] values at t10, t20, t30, and tend were 91.86 (SD 6.26) mm Hg, 95.45% (SD 0.97%) and 20.88 (SD 2.39) mmol/l, respectively. General RPE (genRPE), muscular RPE (muscRPE) and ventilatory RPE (ventilRPE) values at t10, t20, t30, and tend are also presented in table 2. Whereas genRPE and muscRPE significantly increased between t10 and tend (3 (SD 1) vs 6 (SD 2) and 3 (SD 2) vs 6 (SD 2), respectively, p<0.05), ventilRPE remained stable (2 (SD 1), p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

Similar to the data reported in the literature, the MLSS determined from tests 2, 3, 4, and 5 occurred at 71.3% (SD 5.2%) of VO2max14 15 and time to exhaustion during the test performed at MLSS was 55.0 (SD 8.5) min.16

Accordingly, our first important finding was that termination of exercise at the intensity corresponding to the MLSS study occurred without any clear evidence for a failure of homoeostasis in either the cardiorespiratory, metabolic or acid–base systems:

Cardiovascular, respiratory and thermoregulatory parameters

VO2, VCO2, RER, RR, and VE values obtained at the end of the MLSS test remained lower than maximal values reached during incremental test (p >0.05) and respiratory parameters could not be considered as factors causing the termination of exercise during the MLSS test.

The increase in HR values between t10% and t100% (fig 2, p<0.05) could be explained by an increase in sympathetic nervous system activity and an increase in circulating norepinephine concentrations [NE],15 but also by hyperthermia and associated mechanisms to maintain cardiac output17 18 and to dissipate the heat.19 20

The MLSS test was performed in an air-conditioned environment (20°C) and the body temperature at the end of exercise was only 38.4 (SD 0.7)°C, well below values of >40°C known to cause the termination of exercise in the heat for well trained subjects.2123 Thus the achievement of a critical body temperature was not likely the cause of exercise termination.

In addition, whereas [Hb], [Ht] and osmolarity increased between t0 and t10, probably as a result of fluid shifts during the early part of exercise,24 25 there was no further change in any of these variables between t10 and tend (table 2). Hence, a progressive loss of circulating blood volume did not occur and could therefore also not have explained either the progressive rise in HR or the termination of exercise.

In addition, the final HR at the end of the MLSS was significantly less than the HRmax during the maximum exercise test (175 (SD 14) beats/min vs 203 (SD 18) beats/min, p<0.05) and can also not be considered as a factor causing the termination of exercise during the MLSS test. Likewise, SO2 and PO2 did not decrease significantly during the MLSS test and therefore also cannot be considered as factors causing the termination of exercise.

Metabolic parameters

The stability of arterial [La] between t10 and t30 (p>0.05) of the MLSS test (table 2) confirmed that the intensity imposed during this test produced a stable arterial lactate concentration. [Pyr] and the [La]/[Pyr] ratio also produced a steady state in the redox state.15 26

In fact, arterial [La] decreased slightly between t20 and tend during the MLSS, indicating either reduced lactate production or increased peripheral utilisation.27 More to the point, however, the absence of a progressive increase in the arterial [La] rules out the arterial lactate as a cause of exercise termination in this study, in line with the more modern interpretation that lactate is not the cause of fatigue during this form of exercise.28 29

[NH4] responses are different from [La] responses during the MLSS test, in accordance with the study of Ogino et al.30 The progressive increase in arterial [NH4] during the MLSS test might have been due to deamination of AMP to IMP and ammonia in the purine nucleotide cycle,31 and by the catabolism of amino acids by active skeletal muscle. Alternatively, others have suggested that the increase in blood [NH4] during prolonged exercise may be caused by hyperthermia32 and falling muscle glycogen concentrations.33 Nevertheless, if partial glycogen depletion is observed during prolonged exercise,34 this mechanism cannot be held as directly responsible for exhaustion.2

Although an increase in blood [NH4] concentrations has been associated with muscle fatigue and exhaustion, including motor dysfunction, perhaps as a result of so-called central fatigue,35 36 as yet no direct causal relationship between this blood variable and fatigue has been proven. In contrast, Baron et al37 have already shown that exercise performed at a higher exercise intensity (Critical Power: 85.4% (SD 4.8%) of VO2max) could be maintained even though arterial [NH4] was higher than that observed at MLSS.

Hence, there is presently no evidence to conclude that an increase in blood [NH4] is the sole and exclusive cause of exercise termination. Furthermore, if [NH4] does indeed play a role in the development of fatigue during exercise, its effect would likely be as a result of a central (brain) effect rather than one in the peripheral tissues.35

Acid–base status

Even though arterial pH decreased between t0 and t10 (p <0.05), it increased slightly after t10, whereas paCO2 decreased and [HCO3] did not change (table 2), suggesting a ventilatory compensation for a mild exercise-induced metabolic acidosis15 or hyperthermically induced hyperventilation.38 Furthermore, arterial pH at the termination of exercise (∼7.37 units) was much above values considered to cause fatigue by a direct effect in the exercising muscles.39 40

In summary, exhaustion at MLSS occurred whilst homoeostasis was still present in all the major bodily systems that we studied, according to the central governor model,27 whereas the perceptions of discomfort increased progressively until exhaustion, similar to the findings of Baron et al16 during a 2 h swimming test. Hence, genRPE and muscRPE increased whereas ventilRPE remained constant.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that, during exercise performed at MLSS, exhaustion occurred while physiological reserve capacity still existed, but in association with an increase in the ratings of perceived exertion, as predicted by the central governor model. Exercise termination may be induced by an integrative homoeostatic control of the peripheral physiological system specifically to ensure the maintenance of homeostasis.

What is already known on this topic

The central governor model of fatigue proposed that, during exercise, the brain paces the body in response to afferent feedback from multiple central and peripheral sensors, in order to preserve homoeostasis. These anticipatory mechanisms have already been observed for long-duration exercise such as the marathon.

What this study adds

During cycling exercise performed at the aerobic/anaerobic transition, exhaustion occurs after approximately 55 min in well-trained subjects, while physiological reserve capacity still exists. Exercise termination may be induced by an integrative homoeostatic control of the physiological systems specifically to ensure the maintenance of homoeostasis, as predicted by the central governor model.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the department of “Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires” of CHRU of Lille, the Medical Research Council and the National Research Foundation of South Africa of the University of Cape Town.

REFERENCES

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.