You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Cognitive and contextual factors to optimise clinical outcomes in tendinopathy
  1. Adrian James Mallows1,
  2. James Robert Debenham2,
  3. Peter Malliaras3,
  4. Richmond Stace4,
  5. Chris Littlewood5
  1. 1 School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
  2. 2 School of Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
  3. 3 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  5. 5 Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences and Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
  1. Correspondence to Adrian James Mallows, School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK; amallows{at}essex.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098064

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Tendinopathy, a clinical term used to describe ‘tendon-related pain’, is a heterogeneous clinical presentation, reflected by the wide-ranging pain presentations and functional deficits.1 For this population, load-based exercise is effective; however, the ‘optimal’ type of exercise, intensity, frequency and duration are not known.2 3

    Substantial variety has been a feature of the exercise prescription used in tendinopathy research to date. However, this variation does not appear to have impacted the results. Exercise programmes as different as a concentric-eccentric heavy slow loading programme performed three times per week and eccentric only exercises performed twice daily, 7 days/week, have achieved similar results.4 While within-group mean severity scores improve, individual responses are wide ranging for the same exercise programme4 and success rates vary from 44% failing to improve5 to 100% success6 for a similar exercise intervention.

    Here we discuss a novel consideration to explain such phenomena—cognitive and contextual factors that affect each individual therapeutic encounter. We acknowledge that heterogeneity in the research cohorts (eg, age, sex, chronicity, comorbidities) or variations in how the exercise programme was delivered and progressed likely play a role, but we focus on factors we feel have received little attention.

    Psychosocial impact

    Beliefs and fears have received little attention in current tendinopathy management models. Working alliance and self-efficacy are both associated with adherence behaviours and rehabilitation …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.