Table 1

Table 1

Summary of included studies

StudyLocationStudy designDescription of homelessness/accommodationInclusion and exclusion criteria/study drop-outsNo of participantsIntervention
Dawes et al, 201938 UKQualitative (interview)No fixed abode, living in hostel, temporary accommodation and permanent accommodation after being homelessAttendees of one of two park-based running groups operated by the charity ‘A Mile in her Shoes’ in London for women defined as homeless, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported11Outdoor Running (groups)
Grabbe et al, 201347 USAQualitative (interview)No fixed abode or living in sheltersParticipation in at least eight gardening sessions in a daytime shelter for homeless women in a large south-eastern US city, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported8Outdoor Gardening (groups)
Grimes and Smirnova, 202048 USAQualitative (interview)Temporarily housed and most had experienced two or three episodes of homelessnessMen experiencing homelessness who has completed the earn-a-bike programme in the previous year in Kansas, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported16Mixed individual intervention (bicycle provision, cycle safety and maintenance training)
Helge et al, 2014 and
Randers et al, 201239 41
DenmarkQuasi-experimental (non-randomised controlled intervention study)Recruited from homeless shelters and unemployment offices.Men experiencing homelessness who were accessing services in shelters and unemployment offices in Copenhagen, no specified exclusion criteria, withdrawals football group (6/33 consented but did not show up for testing and 9/27 did not complete intervention), control group (4/22 consented but did not show up for testing and 8/18 completed the intervention), no differences in pre-test scores among drop-outs compared with the rest of the subjects28Soccer (group training)
Kendzor et al, 201732 USARandomised controlled trialLiving in a transitional shelter for people experiencing homelessness(1) At least 18 years of age, (2) willing and able to attend study visits, (3) score ≥4 on the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine—Short Form (REALM-SF) indicating >sixth-grade literacy level, (4) physically ambulatory, (5) residents of a transitional shelter in Dallas, Texas (able to show an ID badge) and (6) had been living in the transitional shelter for ≤3 months, exclusions (n=10) due to not reaching the minimum reading level (n=9) and/or staying at the shelter for more than 3 months (n=3), Drop-outs, control group (n=0), intervention (2/17). Reason for drop-out not stated.32Mixed individual intervention (pedometer with step count goals, health education, provision of fruit and vegetables)
Knestaut et al, 201031 USAQualitative (self-reported form, debrief and journal)People living in homeless shelterAdults who had taken part in shelter-based dance programme, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported11Indoor multimodal exercise (Instructor-led dance group)
Magee and Jeanes, 201344 UKQualitative (interview)Living in social services, accommodation or hostels and spent time with no fixed abodeMale participants of the UK squad who attended the inaugural Homeless World Cup, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported6Soccer (group training and Homeless World Cup participation)
Malden et al, 201936 UKQualitative (interview)Living in hostel accommodation or on the streetsParticipants of the Street Fit Scotland intervention who attended both the fitness classes and peer support components of the intervention in March 2016, no specified exclusion criteria, 2/12 of those eligible did not participate—no reason specified.10Indoor multimodal exercise (Instructor-led, leisure centre-based group, with peer support)
Norton et al, 202034 USAQuasi-experimental (non-equivalent groups longitudinal design)Living at a shelter for women without housingWomen residents of a shelter in a large city in Texas, USA who had participated in the HOPE Adventure Therapy pilot programme, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported82Outdoor Adventure (groups)
Parry et al, 202135 UKQualitative (realist evaluation: interviews, focus groups and diary room)Young people experiencing or at risk of homelessness (no further details provided)Young people with experience or at risk of homelessness who attended at least one MST4Life programme workshop (Phase 1) during the time of data collection and housing staff with one-to-one experience of working with the MST4Life participants, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported30 PEH
6 housing service staff
5 OAE staff
Outdoor Adventure (groups)
Parry et al, 202146 UKQualitative (diary room)Living in supported accommodation for young people experiencing homelessnessYoung people with experience or at risk of homelessness who attended and engaged in Phase 1 of MST4Life from different cohorts of MST4Lifeover a 5-year period (2014–2019). 50/113 eligible participants did not participate-reasons not specified, no drop-outs54Outdoor Adventure (groups)
Randers 201042 DenmarkQuasi-experimental (non-randomised controlled intervention study)Nature of homelessness among ‘homeless participants’ undefinedHomeless men, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported15Soccer (group training)
Randers et al, 201840 DenmarkAnalytical cross-sectional (intervention study)Described as homeless, no further details providedWomen experiencing homelessness from three countries (Denmark, Norway and Belgium) who participated in 4-a-side street soccer at Women’s Homeless World Cup in Amsterdam in December 2015, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported15Soccer (Homeless World Cup tournament participation)
Sherry, 201045 AustraliaQualitative (interview)Experience of homelessness in the preceding 2 years or were participating in a drug or alcohol rehabilitation programmeTeam members of the ‘Street Socceroos’, the Australian Homeless World Cup team and, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported8Soccer (group training and Homeless World Cup participation)
Sherry and Strybosch, 201243 AustraliaQualitative (Ethnographic case study)Past or current experience of homelessness and associated social disadvantageTeam members of Australia’s Community Street Soccer Programme (CSSP) over a 4-year period, which is for people who are homeless or experience of homelessness/social disadvantage, staff from the CSSP and key stakeholder or support workers involved in the development and delivery of the programme, no specified exclusion criteria, no study drop-outs165 players
11 Coaches
10 (support workers)
Soccer (group training)
Shors et al, 201456 USAQuasi-experimental (intervention study)‘Recently homeless’ with experience of poverty, trauma or addictive behavioursYoung mothers who were recently homeless then ‘rescued from the streets’ and given housing and food in a residential centre, where they lived with their children, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported15Indoor multimodal exercise (Instructor-led meditation and choreographed aerobic group exercise)
Peachey et al, 201333 USAQualitative (focus groups)Recruited from a tournament for homeless individuals. So, assumption that all participants were homeless—no further details suppliedPlayers and coaches who ‘represented the geographic areas’ of the US-based Street Soccer USA Cup, no specified exclusion criteria or study drop-outs reported11 players
6 staff
Soccer (National Cup tournament participation)
  • PEH, people experiencing homelessness.