COMPARISON OF LABORATORY DATA AMONG THE SIX DIFFERENT PRP SEPARATION SYSTEMS USING 144 SAMPLES | British Journal of Sports Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

For authors

Resources

About

New editors
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Abstracts from the International Sports Science + Sports Medicine Conference 2016

Poster presentations

Pp07

COMPARISON OF LABORATORY DATA AMONG THE SIX DIFFERENT PRP SEPARATION SYSTEMS USING 144 SAMPLES

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Lhee S, Kim J, Jeon J, et al

COMPARISON OF LABORATORY DATA AMONG THE SIX DIFFERENT PRP SEPARATION SYSTEMS USING 144 SAMPLES

British Journal of Sports Medicine 2016;50:e4.